Adventists for Tomorrow

Our mission is to provide a free and open medium that will assist individuals in forming accurate, balanced, and thoughtful opinions regarding issues within and without the church.

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Due to a large increase in spam, I have frozen forum registration. If you are new to the site and want to register, e-mail me personally at vandolson@gmail.com. Thank you.

#126 01-24-14 12:52 am

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Tom Norris, I found the perfect individuals, and denomination for you:   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red-Letter_Christian
You are advocates and friends, unknowingly for Jim Wallis and Tony Campolo. Have at it Tom. We can see you for what you are, a total rejection of the inspiration of the Holy Spirit in NT writing (Luke 24:44-49;  John 16:12-15; Acts 26:15,16; Eph 3:2-6). Have at it. You seem to not trust the subjectivity of the Holy Spirit's movings, but Christ did. Ever heard of spiritual discernment?????   As good ole J.R. use to say, Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh!!!

Also, you believe every point that Des Ford make here, right????  http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/sabbath/DesCovenants.htm  So, Moses could not clarify anything after the ratification of the Old Covenant, and Jesus or the Holy Spirit can not clarify or have new positions introduced after Christ's death, according to your position, right? Note what Des Ford's position is:   

Footnote: 2. A close study of the covenants solves this issue also. Galatians 3:15 and Hebrews 9:16, 17 stress that nothing can be added to a covenant after the sacrificial death which seals it. Thus Sunday was three days too late to become part of the New Covenant. For this reason also, baptism was included by Christ's own example prior to Calvary.

I didn't realize that Dr. Des Ford took this position, but how absurd. The Bible reads as written. Des Ford's position ignores more than half the New Testament with this position. (To think I use to defend this guy. ) Gal 3:15 leaves the words of Jesus open to be interpreted by the Holy Spirit which Jesus predicted, that the Holy Spirit would lead the Apostles into all truth. John 16:12.

From now on it will be, Tom Norris, the Red Letter Christian. Is that OK with you, brother??

Also, to get to the nub of what you stand for, let all readers realize you are for  Jesuism, Jesusism and Jesuanism  as outlined here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuism   A rather myopic few of Christianity, but this is what I see in your discourse, so,  let's call it what it is.

Last edited by bob_2 (01-25-14 12:32 am)

Offline

#127 01-25-14 12:31 pm

tom_norris
Adventist Reform
From: Silver Spring, Md
Registered: 01-02-09
Posts: 877
Website

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Bob refuses to admit he is wrong about the NC Sabbath.  So rather then deal with the points that prove NCT wrong, he tries to ignore the issues and create a diversion.  Let’s see if he can score any points with this latest stunt?

Bob 2 said:  Tom Norris, I found the perfect individuals, and denomination for you:  You are advocates and friends, unknowingly for Jim Wallis and Tony Campolo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red-Letter_Christian


Tom replied:  Good for these people to understand that the church today is so confused and “exploited” that few Christians know what Jesus teaches.  It’s about time that the words of Christ take center stage for the church.  Amen!

However, I note this group is focused on “social issues” as opposed to eschatology, as if the 2nd Coming was not about to end civilization. Adventist Reform is focused on eschatology, correcting false doctrine, and pushing the Advent Movement forward to better understand the Gospel and the final events.

Here is the definition of this group:

“Red-Letter Christians constitute a non-denominational movement within Christianity. Proponents of the movement believe that Christianity, and especially evangelicalism, has been exploited by both right-wing and left-wing political movements and become too partisan and politicized. As a response they endeavor to create an evangelical movement that focuses on the teachings of Jesus Christ, particularly in regard to social issues. The two most prominent figures associated with the movement are Jim Wallis and Tony Campolo.[1]”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red-Letter_Christian

The Red-letter version of the Bible was invented at the beginning of the 20th century.  It was a well-received and helpful tool, remaining popular even to this today.  I am surprised that anyone would attack such an obvious improvement to the printing of the Bible.

See links for history:

http://www.biblecollectors.org/articles … _bible.htm

http://www.crossway.org/blog/2006/03/red-letter-origin/

http://www.bibledesignblog.com/2009/03/ … ibles.html

Bob 2 said:  Have at it Tom. We can see you for what you are, a total rejection of the inspiration of the Holy Spirit in NT writing. Have at it.

Bob 2 said:  Wrong.  The HS can only lead people to remember and understand the words of Jesus.  This is what Jesus teaches:

John 14:26 “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I said to you.

John 15:26  “When the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, that is the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify about Me,

Tom said: There is no battle for doctrinal authority between Christ and the Holy Spirit.  The Gospel is based and defined only by the words, teachings, and actions of Christ, recorded in the Gospels.  There is no new Gospel doctrine from anyone, much less the HS, after the cross. 

Those that marginalize, revise, or ignore the words of Christ, will not be admitted into the Kingdom of God.

Bob 2 said:  You seem to not trust the subjectivity of the Holy Spirit's movings. Ever heard of spiritual discernment?????   As good ole J.R. use to say, Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh!!!

Tom replied:  When it comes to Eternal Life, it is only safe to trust the written words of Christ.  Period.  There is no higher source or authority for the Christian.  The HS can only point to Christ and what he teaches, he cannot point to anyone else, much less to new doctrine.

As for JR, I hope he understood the Gospel before he died.  I like to think he did, but time will tell.  I doubt he would have been so supportive of Adventist Reform had he not embraced the genuine Protestant Gospel that it represents. 

Bob 2 said:  Also, you believe every point that Des Ford makes here, right????
 
http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/sabbath/DesCovenants.htm 

So, Moses could not clarify anything after the ratification of the Old Covenant, and Jesus or the Holy Spirit cannot clarify or have new positions introduced after Christ's death?

Tom replied:  Do you really think you have the proper education and background to instruct Dr. Ford?  The answer is no, if you are wondering.  You are not fit to dust Dr. Ford’s library, much less instruct him about theology.  Comical.

Bob 2 said:  Note what Des Ford's position is:   

“Footnote: 2. A close study of the covenants solves this issue also. Galatians 3:15 and Hebrews 9:16, 17 stress that nothing can be added to a covenant after the sacrificial death, which seals it. Thus Sunday was three days too late to become part of the New Covenant. For this reason also, baptism was included by Christ's own example prior to Calvary.”

I didn't realize that Dr. Des Ford took this position, but how absurd.

Tom said:  Dr. Ford is very correct to understand that no new doctrines can be made after the cross.  Thus, your idea that the HS gives new doctrines to the church is impossible and absurd.

Bob 2 said:  The Bible reads as written. Des Ford's position ignores more than half the New Testament with this position. (To think I use to defend this guy. )

Tom said:  Few understand the Bible to read it correctly.  You are in this large category, - if you were wondering.  Dr. Ford is not.  He has forgotten more about the Bible then you will ever know.  The fact you think you are called to correct and instruct him is laughable.  But also sad.

Bob asked: From now on it will be, Tom Norris, the Red Letter Christian. Is that OK with you, brother??

Tom said:  Wow!  So you think it wrong to focus on the words of Christ?  Very strange.  But not really.  The SDA’s were never taught to follow Jesus; rather, they were trained to follow Ellen White and the Law, and to play Bible word games to validate their many false, OC, and legalistic views.  The SDA’s do not understand, respect, or embrace the Gospel words of Jesus, and neither do you.  Sad.

Bob 2 said:  Also, to get to the nub of what you stand for, let all readers realize you are for Jesuism, Jesusism and Jesuanism as outlined here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuism   

A rather myopic few of Christianity, but this is what I see in your discourse, so, let's call it what it is.

Tom replied:  I stand guilty of teaching that Jesus words represent Eternal Life.  I confess. 

However, you seem to believe that Paul is the Lord of the Sabbath and that he and others are better sources for Gospel doctrine than Christ.  Each to their own.  But I warn you, Paul did not die on the cross for you, me, or anyone.  Nor can he give Eternal Life.  Neither can the Holy Spirit.  Only Jesus.  Which means we must LISTEN to Jesus.

Luke 9:35 Then a voice came out of the cloud, saying, “This is My Son, My Chosen One; listen to Him!”

It is time for all that are serious about Eternal Life to turn to Jesus for Gospel instruction and salvation.  Period.

John 12:47 “If anyone hears My sayings and does not keep them, I do not judge him; for I did not come to judge the world, but to save the world.

John 12:48 “He who rejects Me and does not receive My sayings, has one who judges him; the word I spoke is what will judge him at the last day.

Matt. 7:24  “Therefore everyone who hears these words of Mine and acts on them, may be compared to a wise man who built his house on the rock.

Matt. 24:35 “Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will not pass away.

Mark 8:38 “For whoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will also be ashamed of him when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels.”

Luke 6:46  “Why do you call Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ and do not do what I say?

Luke 7:23 “Blessed is he who does not take offense at Me.”

John 14:24 “He who does not love Me does not keep My words; and the word which you hear is not Mine, but the Father’s who sent Me.

John 15:7 “If you abide in Me, and My words abide in you, ask whatever you wish, and it will be done for you.

It is time for straight Gospel talk for the confused and self-destructing Adventist Community.  Is anyone listening?

Tom Norris for New Covenant Adventism

Last edited by tom_norris (01-25-14 12:33 pm)

Offline

#128 01-25-14 3:10 pm

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Come on Tom, you are doing your accusatory tone again, and playing fast and loose with the Word of God, the Bible, the whole Bible. 

2 Timothy 3:16
New International Version (NIV)

16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,
Cross references:2 Timothy 3:16 : 2Pe 1:20, 212 Timothy 3:16 : S Ro 4:23, 242 Timothy 3:16 : Dt 29:29

Here it is in the KJV:

2 Timothy 3:16
King James Version (KJV)

16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:


No one, least not me, is trying to diminish Jesus words, but He was born under the Old Covenant/Law. He had to live to it's standards, Sabbath and all. His words are often anticipatory in nature, anticipating His Kingdom/New Covenant. This verse says that the Holy Spirit will:

John 16: 7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.

8 And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:

9 Of sin, because they believe not on me;

10 Of righteousness, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more;

11 Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.

12 I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now.

13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.

14 He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.


Here is the same passage in the NIV. There is no limitation given by Jesus of words He had already spoken:

John 16:7 But very truly I tell you, it is for your good that I am going away. Unless I go away, the Advocate will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. 8 When he comes, he will prove the world to be in the wrong about sin and righteousness and judgment: 9 about sin, because people do not believe in me; 10 about righteousness, because I am going to the Father, where you can see me no longer; 11 and about judgment, because the prince of this world now stands condemned.

12 “I have much more to say to you, more than you can now bear. 13 But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come. 14 He will glorify me because it is from me that he will receive what he will make known to you. 15 All that belongs to the Father is mine. That is why I said the Spirit will receive from me what he will make known to you.”

Take verse 10:

John16:10 about righteousness, because I am going to the Father, where you can see me no longer;

Jesus when he was here was a better example of the Decalogue, or any law, by observing His life. When He goes away, the Holy Spirit will be that guide. Christ's Law (1 Cor 9:21) can be empowered in our lives with such a guide and force.

Oh, do you worship Des Ford in your Reformed SDA as one of it's saints?? Shame on you!!!  He is only a fallible man!!!

Last edited by bob_2 (01-25-14 6:49 pm)

Offline

#129 01-27-14 12:12 pm

tom_norris
Adventist Reform
From: Silver Spring, Md
Registered: 01-02-09
Posts: 877
Website

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Bob, you seem beyond help.  So be it.  Your life, your choice, your consequences.

This SDA idea that the OT is just as valid as the NT is very wrong, even fatal.  While the SDA’s teach that the “Bible” is a “whole,” also claiming that the 10C’s are not part of the OC, they are very wrong and confused.   

There is no such doctrine as a “balanced Gospel.”  This is just SDA code for blending the OC with the NC, thus developing a false Gospel that is based on law keeping and sanctification, which will (supposedly) be examined in the IJ. 

This is a false Gospel that the Reformers repudiated.  So why are the SDA’s embracing such ant-Christ, anti-Protestant, teachings?

Moreover, this additional SDA error that the Holy Spirit will bring new doctrines into the church, like the IJ, through others, like Uriah Smith or Ellen White, is blasphemy.   It is ludicrous and delusional.

The Gospel cannot exist in such a false, fictionalized atmosphere, which is why so many in the SDA community cannot comprehend it.

Bob 2 said: No one, least not me, is trying to diminish Jesus words, but He was born under the Old Covenant/Law. He had to live to it's standards, Sabbath and all.

Tom replied:  You, and the NCT crowd, are ignoring, revising, and repudiating the NC Sabbath teachings of Christ.  The record is clear on this point. 

In fact, you are trying to make the point that Jesus teaches new doctrines will come into the church through the HS.  And this new teaching is about the Every Day / No Day Sabbath that was invented in the 1970’s by Zaspel and Wells.  Really?

Sorry, but such nonsense is not credible in the slightest.  What is the matter with you to believe such garbage?  The SDA’s have ruined your mind, like they have with millions of others.  Very sad.  Those that embrace a false view of the Gospel Story will always end up with a false view of the Gospel and all doctrine, especially the Sabbath.

Bob 2 said: Jesus when he was here was a better example of the Decalogue, or any law, by observing His life.

Tom said:  Wrong.  Jesus did not come here to promote or save the OC law.  This is SDA myth and legalism.  Rather, he was on a mission to preach the Gospel and create the NC church.  So you and the SDA’s have it backwards and very wrong.  No surprise here.  SDA theology has confused the law with the Gospel, and thus they have misunderstood both.

Moreover, Jesus refused to obey the 4th commandment.  You would know this if you could read the Gospels without your SDA blinders.  To the SDA mind, the fact that Jesus REFUSED to obey the OC Sabbath seems impossible and blasphemous.  So they just re-write the Gospel Story and make it fit with their confused, legalistic expectations.  Thus they teach that Jesus was a great defender and follower of the OC, 7th day when he was not.  He was the greatest Sabbath breaker in the history of the Jews!

Bob, your mind has been poisoned by the SDA’s, which explains why you can’t understand the genuine Gospel, with its’ active and reformed 7th day, Gospel Sabbath.  The SDA’s have been following a false Christ of their own making, and so too the NCT crowd, which explains why it is so easy to expose such theology as fraudulent.

Bob 2 said:  When He goes away, the Holy Spirit will be that guide. Christ's Law (1 Cor 9:21) can be empowered in our lives with such a guide and force.

Tom said:  So Jesus gives us the power to obey the law of Christ?  This is great error from the SDA’s, why do you still embrace it? 

First, this can’t be true because Jesus does not teach that any Christian is to follow the OC, non-working Sabbath of Moses, aka the 4th commandment.

Second, the law of Christ does not teach anyone to obey the 4th Commandment as the SDA’s teach.  It only contains the active and reformed Sabbath of Christ.

Third, the HS can only “guide” us into understanding the Gospel words and teaching of Christ, which is called the law of Christ.  He cannot guide us into anything else, much less new doctrine from others.  Those that claim to have found new doctrines from Christ are liars and frauds.  Why?  Because there can be no new doctrines added to what Jesus taught in the Gospels and in some other parts of the NT, like the book of Revelation. 

Once the cannon is closed, it is closed forever.  Such is the status today.  There can be no improved or different Gospel after Christ, in spite of the 2nd century Gnostics that claimed otherwise. 

So this idea that new doctrines can come from Christ after the cross is very old and very wrong.  If you don’t like what Jesus teaches about the NC Sabbath, too bad.  No one gets to change and revise the words of Christ, much less lead others to follow a false Gospel that repudiates what Jesus teaches.

NCT is a Gnostic type of teaching that depends on ignoring what Christ has taught in the Gospels about the Sabbath.  Once ignored, they find a dishonest way to invent new doctrine that Christ never taught.  Such a hermeneutic is fatal.  Such double-talk worthless.

The SDA’s, like the Jews they emulate, are condemned for refusing to listen to Christ and for joining with his Sabbath keeping, tithe paying, enemies that sent him to the cross for breaking the 4th commandment.  Shame on them.

What Jesus teaches about the Gospel and the NC Sabbath is what the church must follow.  Those that refuse, have forfeited Eternal Life.  Just like the Jews that also hated the Gospel Sabbath of Christ.

At for the last Judgment, which is the 2nd Coming, those who have refused to pay attention to the words and teachings of Christ will be doomed.  This is why it is so important to make sure we are following the genuine Jesus of the Gospels and not the many frauds that abound. 

One sure way to identify the proper Christ is to only follow the Good Shepherd with the active and reformed, 7th day Sabbath.  Jesus teaches that this is a sign of the genuine Christ.  Those who fight against what Jesus teaches in the Gospels will be locked out of the kingdom of God. 

All that embrace the OC Sabbath of the SDA’s or the Every Day doctrine of NCT will be doomed if they do not repent and embrace the genuine Christ and his Gospel Sabbath.  Let all be very careful what they believe and who they follow. 

Tom Norris for Adventist Reform

Offline

#130 01-28-14 1:54 am

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Tom replied:  You, and the NCT crowd, are ignoring, revising, and repudiating the NC Sabbath teachings of Christ.  The record is clear on this point.

When Jesus says that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath, and He was Lord of the Sabbath, He was not proclaiming it as New Covenant Doctrine. He was saying that God gave the Sabbath to a unique people and the Sabbath ought not to "wag the dog". Also, He was expressing His authority by declaring Him Lord of the Sabbath. But you like the SDAs must declare Col 2:16-17 a "ceremonial" statement, when it is meant as a fulfillment of the 4th Commandment, and not ceremonial law. I think you are the confused one. The Sabbath is not part of the Gospel like you and the SDAs make it. It is an "obsolete" doctrine of the Old Covenant as declared in Hebrews 8:13, and 2 Cor 3:7:

2 Cor 3: 7 Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, transitory though it was, 8 will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? 9 If the ministry that brought condemnation was glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness! 10 For what was glorious has no glory now in comparison with the surpassing glory. 11 And if what was transitory came with glory, how much greater is the glory of that which lasts!

You do not allow for the interpretations to flow after the ratification of the New Covenant by Jesus on the cross. There were plenty of clarifying statements after the ratification of the Old Covenant. You should know both these items.

My position can hardly be called traditional Adventism. Maybe NCT theology, which I would agree.

Last edited by bob_2 (01-28-14 2:01 am)

Offline

#131 01-29-14 12:52 pm

tom_norris
Adventist Reform
From: Silver Spring, Md
Registered: 01-02-09
Posts: 877
Website

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Bob 2 said;  When Jesus says that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath, and He was Lord of the Sabbath, He was not proclaiming it as New Covenant Doctrine.

Tom replied:  Jesus Gospel words mean what they mean.  He could not have been talking about the OC Sabbath because that was made only for the Jews.  But he did not use the word Jews.  He could have, but he did not.  So he is making new doctrine for the new church.

Who are you to change what Christ teaches?  Who is anyone?  This is your problem; you refuse to listen to Christ.

Those who allow the Holy Spirit to guide them, will only be led back to the literal and written words of Christ.  It is a false Spirit that guides one to ignore, revise, and repudiate the words of Christ.  So Bob, this means you do not have the HS, but another Spirit.

Jesus’ NC Sabbath teaching was new to the Jews.  So new, amazing, and different, that they could not process such a strange doctrine.  Many today have the same problem, for the same reason.

Let all learn from the words of Christ.  He is the master theologian, whose words are not to be changed or manipulated in any way.

Bob 2 said:  He was saying that God gave the Sabbath to a unique people and the Sabbath ought not to "wag the dog".

Tom said:  Wrong.  Jesus is not teachings the OC Sabbath of Moses, as you and the SDA’s claim.  He is teaching a different, NC doctrine of the 7th day where those who follow the Gospel can work on the Sabbath and not be guilty of sin.  This is not the Jewish Sabbath, but the Gospel Sabbath.

Bob, you need to stop placing words, ideas, and doctrines in the mouth of Christ.  Jesus DID NOT say that the NC Sabbath was made for the Jews.  He said the (Gospel) Sabbath was made for all mankind, which is very different.  Stop changing the words of Jesus to fit with your false doctrines.  This is fatal.

Bob 2 said:  Also, He was expressing His authority by declaring Him Lord of the Sabbath.

Tom said:  Like all SDA’s, you have confused Jesus with Moses. Pitiful.  What is the point of declaring oneself the Lord of something that is being abolished?  None.  However, Jesus is the Lord of the reformed, NC Sabbath.  As the creator of the world and of the original Sabbath, and of the OC Sabbath; this NC Sabbath doctrine has a special place in the theology of Christ.

Bob 2 said:  But you like the SDAs must declare Col 2:16-17 a "ceremonial" statement, when it is meant as a fulfillment of the 4th Commandment, and not ceremonial law.

Tom said:  This passage is about the Moral law.  The OC Sabbath of the Jews.  The SDA’s are wrong.  Stop misrepresenting my views.

The Sabbath in Colossians & Hebrews
http://www.atomorrow.net/fluxbb/viewtopic.php?id=242

Bob 2 said:  I think you are the confused one.

Tom said:  Bob, you have failed to score any points for NCT.  The more you try the worse it looks.  You need to repent before it’s too late.

Bob 2 said:  The Sabbath is not part of the Gospel like you and the SDAs make it. It is an "obsolete" doctrine of the Old Covenant as declared in Hebrews 8:13, and 2 Cor 3:7:

Tom replied:  The OC Sabbath is abolished and no longer valid under the NC.  This is why Jesus teaches that his followers are free to work on the 7th day Gospel Sabbath and not be guilty of sin.

The NC doctrine of the Sabbath, as taught by Christ, is part of the Law of Christ, part of the Gospel of Christ.

Bob quoted:  2 Cor 3: 7 Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, transitory though it was, 8 will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? 9 If the ministry that brought condemnation was glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness! 10 For what was glorious has no glory now in comparison with the surpassing glory. 11 And if what was transitory came with glory, how much greater is the glory of that which lasts!

Tom said:  The OC has been surpassed and replaced by the NC.  Thus the OC Sabbath of the 4th Commandment has also been surpassed and replaced by the NC Sabbath doctrine of Christ.  Here all may work on the 7th day and not be guilty of sin.

Bob 2 said:  You do not allow for the interpretations to flow after the ratification of the New Covenant by Jesus on the cross.

Tom said:  The NT Cannon closed in the 1st century.  While the 2nd century Gnostics tried to push forward new Gospel doctrines that were correctly rejected by the church Fathers. 

Sorry, but the SDA’s are wrong to teach that new doctrines, like the IJ, are valid.  And so too the new Sabbath views of Zaspel.  All Gospel doctrine must conform to the written words, sayings, and actions of Christ, including what he teaches about the 4th Commandment. 

It’s really very simple.  Those that follow the genuine Christ will understand and embrace the correct doctrine of the Sabbath that he teaches in the Gospels.  Those that don’t, - won’t.

Bob 2 said:  My position can hardly be called traditional Adventism. Maybe NCT theology, which I would agree.

Tom said:  Your confused position represents many errors, some from the SDA’s, and some from the NCT crowd.  Thus you have embraced legions of false doctrine, as has most everyone else.  Sad.

It is time for those that claim to follow Christ to understand what that means.  It does not mean anyone can manipulate the Gospel Story to fit their personal views and traditions.  Nor does it mean they can twist the words of Christ to mean whatever they want.

Luke 9:35 Then a voice came out of the cloud, saying, “This is My Son, My Chosen One; listen to Him!”

It is time for all to repent and pay attention to Jesus, the Lord of the Gospel Sabbath.

Tom Norris for New Covenant Adventism

Offline

#132 01-30-14 11:41 pm

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Tom you ignore:


Luke 24:44 He said to them, “This is what I told you while I was still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms.”

45 Then he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures. 46 He told them, “This is what is written: The Messiah will suffer and rise from the dead on the third day, 47 and repentance for the forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. 48 You are witnesses of these things. 49 I am going to send you what my Father has promised; but stay in the city until you have been clothed with power from on high.”

sad

and

Col 2:16 Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. 17 These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ.

Last edited by bob_2 (01-30-14 11:42 pm)

Offline

#133 02-01-14 6:41 pm

tom_norris
Adventist Reform
From: Silver Spring, Md
Registered: 01-02-09
Posts: 877
Website

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Bob, you are not being responsive or honest.  Moreover, your continued manipulation and misuse of the scriptures is not helpful. 

Poor Hermeneutics

Luke 24:44 is not about the doctrine of the Sabbath, nor does Col 2: 16 say there is no Sabbath for the church, much less that it is abolished and changed into an Every Day / No Day position.  You do not understand the NT.

If you want to understand the NC Sabbath of Christ, you must go to the Gospels and learn directly from Jesus.  Paul is not the Lord of the Sabbath, nor does he give anyone Eternal Life.  Only Jesus can explain the NC doctrine of the 7th day Sabbath, and only Jesus can save those that follow him by faith.

Jesus Did Not Fulfill Sabbath

This idea that Jesus “fulfilled” the Sabbath, and then abolished it, changing it into an Every Day state of spiritual rest, - is pure myth, fiction, and double-talk.  Such a point was never taught by Christ.   NCT is false doctrine.  Sorry. 

The Genuine Christ Teaches Reformed Sabbath

Those that seek Eternal Life, must find the genuine Christ, and follow his teachings as if he were the Good Shepherd and we his sheep.  This is what Jesus teaches when it comes to the NC Sabbath.  Hear the words of Christ in response to those that would not believe in his active, 7th day, Gospel Sabbath.

John 10:1  “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who does not enter by the door into the fold of the sheep, but climbs up some other way, he is a thief and a robber.

John 10:2 “But he who enters by the door is a shepherd of the sheep.

John 10:3 “To him the doorkeeper opens, and the sheep hear his voice, and he calls his own sheep by name and leads them out.

John 10:4 “When he puts forth all his own, he goes ahead of them, and the sheep follow him because they know his voice.

John 10:5 “A stranger they simply will not follow, but will flee from him, because they do not know the voice of strangers.”

John 10:27 “My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me;

John 10:28 and I give eternal life to them, and they will never perish; and no one will snatch them out of My hand.

Those that refuse to understand and follow the active and reformed 7th day Sabbath of Christ are not following Jesus, but the doctrine of his enemies.  They are lost sheep, being misled by wolves and hired hands.  Beware false doctrine.

Tom Norris, for the Gospel Sabbath of Christ

Offline

#134 02-02-14 5:56 am

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Asked again, who else believes this beside you??? It is a bizarre take on the Sabbath in the New Covenant. And Tom, stop giving the one man against the world answers and truly see if there are scholars that have studied the Bible thoroughly that see it your way. One can get in a lot of trouble following one man, i.e. Waco and Jonestown. Take my request seriously or go away. BTW The last scripture quote has nothing to do with the Sabbath. To say the way into the fold has the Sabbath as part of the doorposts, is your manufactured position.

Last edited by bob_2 (02-02-14 5:58 am)

Offline

#135 02-02-14 1:53 pm

tom_norris
Adventist Reform
From: Silver Spring, Md
Registered: 01-02-09
Posts: 877
Website

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Bob 2 said:  Asked again, who else believes this beside you???

Tom replied:  This is the same question that the Jewish leaders asked.  While many people did believe in Jesus and his new Gospel teachings, the religious leaders refused.  Not only that, they pointed to their rejection of Christ’s theology as if that were sufficient reason not to believe. 

John 7:40  Some of the people therefore, when they heard these words, were saying, “This certainly is the Prophet.”

John 7:41 Others were saying, “This is the Christ.”  Still others were saying, “Surely the Christ is not going to come from Galilee, is He?

John 7:42 “Has not the Scripture said that the Christ comes from the descendants of David, and from Bethlehem, the village where David was?”

John 7:43 So a division occurred in the crowd because of Him.

John 7:44 Some of them wanted to seize Him, but no one laid hands on Him.

John 7:45  The officers then came to the chief priests and Pharisees, and they said to them, “Why did you not bring Him?”

John 7:46 The officers answered, “Never has a man spoken the way this man speaks.”

John 7:47 The Pharisees then answered them, “You have not also been led astray, have you?

John 7:48 “No one of the rulers or Pharisees has believed in Him, has he?

John 7:49 “But this crowd which does not know the Law is accursed.”

It was the faithless Jews that judged the Gospel based on its popularity with those who controlled religion.  But truth is not a popularity contest, as if those in charge can be trusted to tell the truth.  If the Gospel Story teaches anything, it is that those in control of religion are not to be trusted or believed.  Nor is truth subject to “who else believes.”

All the disciples ran away from Christ and abandoned him.  None understood or believed the Gospel.  Does this mean the Gospel is wrong and that Christ was a fraud?  Hardly.  Truth is truth regardless how many, or who, believes.

Bob 2 said:  It is a bizarre take on the Sabbath in the New Covenant.

Tom replied:  I understand why you would think like this.  This is what the OC Jews also said about Jesus’ NC view of the 7th day Sabbath.  They thought Christ had literally lost his mind.  The Sabbath keeping Jews were stunned and amazed by Jesus NC Sabbath teaching, and so too will the last church go through the same process of Gospel discovery.  This process has already started.

John 10:19  A division occurred again among the Jews because of these words.

John 10:20 Many of them were saying, “He has a demon and is insane. Why do you listen to Him?”

John 10:21 Others were saying, “These are not the sayings of one demon-possessed. A demon cannot open the eyes of the blind, can he?”

Gospel truth is not to be judged by tradition or error.  What Jesus teaches about the 7th day Sabbath is Gospel doctrine for the church.  There should be no debate about such a point, nor should anyone look to others for a definition of the NC Sabbath. 

The Gospel Sabbath, as taught by Christ in the 1st century, is a very surprising and unique doctrine that has been misunderstood from the very start and then again for many, many years since.  At the end of time, when the Gospel becomes clear, so too will the Gospel Sabbath.  This is what is taking place now for all to see.

Bob 2 said:  And Tom, stop giving the one man against the world answers and truly see if there are scholars that have studied the Bible thoroughly that see it your way. One can get in a lot of trouble following one man, i.e. Waco and Jonestown.

Tom replied:  Your words condemn you.  The Gospel is based on “one man.”  And so too the NC Sabbath.  Jesus is the Gospel Man.  Any that follow him for Eternal Life had better submit to him as having the full authority to create and teach Gospel doctrine.  Unlike the Jews, people today had better repent and embrace what Christ teaches about everything, including about his active and reformed, 7th day Sabbath.

No one will get into any trouble by following the Gospel teachings of Christ.  He is the Good Shepherd, and we are to follow, trust, and obey him as if we were his sheep, and our lives depended on his every word.

Bob 2 said:  Take my request seriously or go away. BTW The last scripture quote has nothing to do with the Sabbath. To say the way into the fold has the Sabbath as part of the doorposts, is your manufactured position.

Tom said:  Those who teach that Christ’s words and doctrines should be ignored, will not be welcomed into the Kingdom of God.  Eternal life is only for those that understand and embrace what Jesus teaches in the Gospels, which includes his active and reformed NC Sabbath.

As for the Good Shepherd motif in John 10:  it is part if the many Sabbath debates that took place between Jesus and the OC Jewish leaders.  You would know this if you read the Gospels, instead of relying on proof texting.

This Sabbath debate started in John 9 when Jesus healed the man born blind on the Sabbath, causing great debate and division.

John 9:1  As He passed by, He saw a man blind from birth.

John 9:2 And His disciples asked Him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he would be born blind?”

John 9:3 Jesus answered, “It was neither that this man sinned, nor his parents; but it was so that the works of God might be displayed in him.

John 9:4 “We must work the works of Him who sent Me as long as it is day; night is coming when no one can work.

John 9:5 “While I am in the world, I am the Light of the world.”

John 9:6 When He had said this, He spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle, and applied the clay to his eyes,

John 9:16 Therefore some of the Pharisees were saying, “This man is not from God, because He does not keep the Sabbath.” But others were saying, “How can a man who is a sinner perform such signs?” And there was a division among them.

The story goes on and on about this healing, with the man and his parents being interrogated.  The now sighted man remained loyal to Christ and was thus excommunicated from Judaism for his faith.

John 9:26 So they said to him, “What did He do to you? How did He open your eyes?”

John 9:27 He answered them, “I told you already and you did not listen; why do you want to hear it again? You do not want to become His disciples too, do you?”

John 9:28 They reviled him and said, “You are His disciple, but awe are disciples of Moses.

John 9:29 “We know that God has spoken to Moses, but as for this man, awe do not know where He is from.”

John 9:30 The man answered and said to them, “Well, here is an amazing thing, that you do not know where He is from, and yet He opened my eyes.

John 9:31 “We know that God does not hear sinners; but if anyone is God-fearing and does His will, He hears him.

John 9:32  “Since the beginning of time it has never been heard that anyone opened the eyes of a person born blind.

John 9:33 “If this man were not from God, He could do nothing.”

John 9:34 They answered him, “You were born entirely in sins, and are you teaching us?” So they put him out.

At the conclusion of this long Sabbath debate, Jesus condemns the Jewish leaders, calling them blind and unsaved and then launches into his famous teaching about the Good Shepherd.

John 9:35  Jesus heard that they had put him out, and finding him, He said, Do you believe in the Son of Man?

John 9:36 He answered, “Who is He, Lord, that I may believe in Him?”

John 9:37 Jesus said to him, “You have both seen Him, and He is the one who is talking with you.”

John 9:38 And he said, “Lord, I believe.” And he worshiped Him.

Here is one of the first converts to the Reformed Sabbath of Christ, even as the Jewish leaders were judged guilty for not believing, or even trying to believe.

John 9:39 And Jesus said, “For judgment I came into this world, so that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may become blind.”

John 9:40 Those of the Pharisees who were with Him heard these things and said to Him, “We are not blind too, are we?”

John 9:41 Jesus said to them, “If you were blind, you would have no sin; but since you say, ‘We see,’ your sin remains.

John 10:1  “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who does not enter by the door into the fold of the sheep, but climbs up some other way, he is a thief and a robber.

John 10:2 “But he who enters by the door is a shepherd of the sheep.

John 10:3 “To him the doorkeeper opens, and the sheep hear his voice, and he calls his own sheep by name and leads them out.

John 10:4 “When he puts forth all his own, he goes ahead of them, and the sheep follow him because they know his voice.

John 10:5 “A stranger they simply will not follow, but will flee from him, because they do not know the voice of strangers.”

Few understood what Jesus was saying, so he went into more detail in defense of his active and reformed Gospel Sabbath:

John 10:6 This figure of speech Jesus spoke to them, but they did not understand what those things were which He had been saying to them.

John 10:7  So Jesus said to them again, “Truly, truly, I say to you, I am the door of the sheep.

John 10:8 “All who came before Me are thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not hear them.

John 10:9 “I am the door; if anyone enters through Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture.

John 10:10 “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly.

John 10:11  “I am the good shepherd; the good shepherd lays down His life for the sheep.

John 10:12 “He who is a hired hand, and not a shepherd, who is not the owner of the sheep, sees the wolf coming, and leaves the sheep and flees, and the wolf snatches them and scatters them.

John 10:13 “He flees because he is a hired hand and is not concerned about the sheep.

John 10:14 “I am the good shepherd, and I know My own and My own know Me,

This dramatic Sabbath debate ended the way it started, that is with debate, confusion, and division.

John 10:19   A division occurred again among the Jews because of these words.

John 10:20 Many of them were saying, “He has a demon and is insane. Why do you listen to Him?”

John 10:21 Others were saying, “These are not the sayings of one demon-possessed. A demon cannot open the eyes of the blind, can he?”

Few today have any idea that the Good Shepherd teaching of Christ is all about his reformed and active 7th day Sabbath.  Few have any idea what Jesus is really teaching about the law, Sabbath, and salvation, which is why no church or denomination today has a correct view of the NC Sabbath of Christ, least of all the SDA’s or the NCT crowd that also claims to have expertise about this doctrine.

Today, it is time to take a serious look at what Jesus teaches about the law and the Gospel.  What he says is what matters most.  Those who are honest of heart will not ignore or repudiate what Christ teaches about anything, much less about the 7th day, nor will they lead others into false doctrine and away from the Good Shepherd.

John 10:24 The Jews then gathered around Him, and were saying to Him, “How long will You keep us in suspense? If You are the Christ, tell us plainly.”

John 10:25 Jesus answered them, “I told you, and you do not believe; the works that I do in My Father’s name, these testify of Me.

John 10:26 “But you do not believe because you are not of My sheep.

John 10:27 “My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me;

John 10:28 and I give eternal life to them, and they will never perish; and no one will snatch them out of My hand.

Eternal Life is only for those that follow the genuine Christ.  It is only for those that allow their spiritual blindness to be cured, embracing what Jesus teaches about his reformed and active, 7th day Sabbath

Mark 4:23 “If anyone has ears to hear, let him hear.”

Tom Norris for Adventist Reform

Offline

#136 02-02-14 6:28 pm

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

John 7:37 On the last and greatest day of the festival [the Festival of Tabernacles], Jesus stood and said in a loud voice, “Let anyone who is thirsty come to me and drink. 38 Whoever believes in me, as Scripture has said, rivers of living water will flow from within them.” 39 By this he meant the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were later to receive. Up to that time the Spirit had not been given, since Jesus had not yet been glorified.

Tom look at this passage just before yours. This is typical of how you approach topics. It has nothing to do with the Sabbath, but everything about Him declaring Himself the Son of God. John explains in this passage that Jesus was talking about the Holy Spirit being outpoured which Jesus said would happen. The Holy Spirit moved and inspired the writers of the NT/NC books of the Bible. You denigrate them, you denigrate the Holy Spirit and Jesus who left so He could send Him, the Holy Spirit.

Tom, you read the Bible with your assumptions in front of what are important parts of the New Covenant that is Jesus New Kingdom. Who said that there must be a holy day. If you are into holy days, when did Jesus say the words you and I quote above??   

John 7:6 Therefore Jesus told them, “My time is not yet here; for you any time will do. 7 The world cannot hate you, but it hates me because I testify that its works are evil. 8 You go to the festival. I am not going up to this festival, because my time has not yet fully come.” 9 After he had said this, he stayed in Galilee.

10 However, after his brothers had left for the festival[Festival of Tabernacles, he went also, not publicly, but in secret. 11 Now at the festival the Jewish leaders were watching for Jesus and asking, “Where is he?”

Tom, lets talk a moment about this holy day he honored by His presence, "As His custom was...". Should we keep this Holy Festival because Jesus attended it. Should we not follow His example in all ways??? What say you??

Jesus said nothing of keeping the Sabbath Holy in the 40 days between His resurrection and His ascension, but did appear a number of times, the first day of the week. I am not suggesting by that, that there is any mandate for Sunday to be the Sabbath for Christians, though some claim that, of which there is no Biblical proof. As far as your mockery of "an everyday Sabbath", this is high mockery of which you are good at. I am not saying an everyday Sabbath, but if the ultimate goal of the Christian and God/Jesus is for the Christian to REST eternally, why do you mock it so. Everyday, we can request the rest, forgiveness Jesus has made possible. Congregations are urged as are Christians to "assembly yourself" and not isolate ourselves from the fellowship of other believers. We should not be judging by which day one assemblys on but be convinced in our own minds what we do or don't do toward  God.  Here is the whole chapter of John 14:

John 14:1 Accept the one whose faith is weak, without quarreling over disputable matters. 2 One person’s faith allows them to eat anything, but another, whose faith is weak, eats only vegetables. 3 The one who eats everything must not treat with contempt the one who does not, and the one who does not eat everything must not judge the one who does, for God has accepted them. 4 Who are you to judge someone else’s servant? To their own master, servants stand or fall. And they will stand, for the Lord is able to make them stand.

5 One person considers one day more sacred than another; another considers every day alike. Each of them should be fully convinced in their own mind. 6 Whoever regards one day as special does so to the Lord. Whoever eats meat does so to the Lord, for they give thanks to God; and whoever abstains does so to the Lord and gives thanks to God. 7 For none of us lives for ourselves alone, and none of us dies for ourselves alone. 8 If we live, we live for the Lord; and if we die, we die for the Lord. So, whether we live or die, we belong to the Lord. 9 For this very reason, Christ died and returned to life so that he might be the Lord of both the dead and the living.

10 You, then, why do you judge your brother or sister? Or why do you treat them with contempt? For we will all stand before God’s judgment seat. 11 It is written:


“‘As surely as I live,’ says the Lord,
‘every knee will bow before me;
    every tongue will acknowledge God.’”

12 So then, each of us will give an account of ourselves to God.

13 Therefore let us stop passing judgment on one another. Instead, make up your mind not to put any stumbling block or obstacle in the way of a brother or sister. 14 I am convinced, being fully persuaded in the Lord Jesus, that nothing is unclean in itself. But if anyone regards something as unclean, then for that person it is unclean. 15 If your brother or sister is distressed because of what you eat, you are no longer acting in love. Do not by your eating destroy someone for whom Christ died. 16 Therefore do not let what you know is good be spoken of as evil. 17 For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit, 18 because anyone who serves Christ in this way is pleasing to God and receives human approval.

19 Let us therefore make every effort to do what leads to peace and to mutual edification. 20 Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All food is clean, but it is wrong for a person to eat anything that causes someone else to stumble. 21 It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother or sister to fall.

22 So whatever you believe about these things keep between yourself and God. Blessed is the one who does not condemn himself by what he approves. 23 But whoever has doubts is condemned if they eat, because their eating is not from faith; and everything that does not come from faith is sin.

Last, are you by not answering who else sees this the same way as you, you are declaring yourself a prophet on equal to God/Jesus???

Last edited by bob_2 (02-02-14 6:56 pm)

Offline

#137 02-05-14 1:30 pm

tom_norris
Adventist Reform
From: Silver Spring, Md
Registered: 01-02-09
Posts: 877
Website

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Tom said:  Bob, why do you refuse to learn the doctrine of the Sabbath from Christ?   He has a lot to teach on this topic.  Could it be that you don’t like what he teaches, so you refuse to acknowledge, much less embrace the NC Sabbath of Christ?

You are not being honest with the NT, nor are you searching for truth.  Why do you ignore the passages where Christ teaches about the Sabbath, and why do you go to other Gospel passages where he does not, claiming you have found the truth about the Sabbath? 

How can you claim to follow Christ, when in fact, you are running away from him and from his active and reformed doctrine of the 7th day?

It is obvious that you do not have the Holy Spirit, because if you did, he would guide you to the words of Christ, not to himself.  Thus the wrong Spirit is leading you, which is why you cannot understand the Gospel or the NC Sabbath of Christ.

John 14:26 “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I said to you.

John 15:26  “When the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, that is the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify about Me,

John 16:12  “I have many more things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now.

John 16:13 “But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come.

John 16:14 “He will glorify Me, for He will take of Mine and will disclose it to you.

Bob 2 quoted John 7:37 and then said: Tom look at this passage just before yours. This is typical of how you approach topics. It has nothing to do with the Sabbath, but everything about Him declaring Himself the Son of God.

Tom said:  First, John 7 is the wrong passage to try and understand the NC Sabbath of Christ.  You would know this if you had the right Spirit, and were being led to the words of Christ, which are very close by.

In fact, you are ignoring two long Sabbath debates in John, the first, which starts with John 5, and another that starts in John 9. 

Why do you look to John 7 to learn about the Sabbath, when there are two large passages close by where Jesus teaches about this topic?  John 7: 37 has nothing to do with the Sabbath.  Very strange behavior.

If you want to understand what Jesus teaches about the Gospel Sabbath, you must go to the passages where that topic is discussed.  Why do you go to the passages that do not talk about the Sabbath?  Why not go to where the topic is featured?  That is what an honest and sane person, led by the Holy Spirit would do.  But you are neither, nor do you have the Spirit of Christ.

There are a number of Sabbath debates in the book of John, starting with John 5 and going on for 47 verses, where Jesus cured the cripple and told him to pick up his bed and carry it in public. 

John 5:7 The sick man answered Him, “Sir, I have no man to put me into the pool when the water is stirred up, but while I am coming, another steps down before me.”

John 5:8 Jesus *said to him, “Get up, pick up your pallet and walk.”

John 5:9 Immediately the man became well, and picked up his pallet and began to walk.   Now it was the Sabbath on that day.

John 5:10 So the Jews were saying to the man who was cured, “It is the Sabbath, and it is not permissible for you to carry your pallet.”

John 5:11 But he answered them, “He who made me well was the one who said to me, ‘Pick up your pallet and walk.’”

This Sabbath debate shows Jesus claiming to be following God his Father, even claiming that God has endorsed his new and active doctrine of the Sabbath.  This has nothing to do with John 7, but everything to do with Jesus active and reformed NC Sabbath under discussion here, and in other places, like John 9.

John 5:15 The man went away, and told the Jews that it was Jesus who had made him well.

John 5:16 For this reason the Jews were persecuting Jesus, because He was doing these things on the Sabbath.

John 5:17 But He answered them, “My Father is working until now, and I Myself am working.”

John 5:18 For this reason therefore the Jews were seeking all the more to kill Him, because He not only was breaking the Sabbath, but also was calling God His own Father, making Himself equal with God.

John 5:19  Therefore Jesus answered and was saying to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of Himself, unless it is something He sees the Father doing; for whatever the Father does, these things the Son also does in like manner.

Bob, your attempt to ignore the proper passages that deal with the Sabbath, by quoting John 7:37, is very dishonest and shows that you refuse to take Jesus Sabbath teaching seriously.  You are not acting in good faith in these discussions.  You are running away from Christ.

However, I was referring to the Sabbath Debate that started in John 9, which concluded with Jesus’ teaching about the Good Shepherd, which you deny.  While you refuse to believe that Jesus has any worthwhile Sabbath teaching, the facts condemn such a view.  Thus, like the Jews, you have denied and repudiated Christ and his Gospel Sabbath.  He is not the Good Shepherd for you, nor do you follow his Gospel Sabbath.

Any that want to know what Jesus teaches about the Sabbath must study and understand the many Sabbath debates in the Gospels, - not ignore them and pretend they don’t exist. 

Why do people run from the Sabbath teachings of Christ?  Why do they deny what he teaches?  Why did the Jews?

Bob 2 said:  John explains in this passage (John 7:37)) that Jesus was talking about the Holy Spirit being outpoured which Jesus said would happen. The Holy Spirit moved and inspired the writers of the NT/NC books of the Bible. You denigrate them, you denigrate the Holy Spirit and Jesus who left so He could send Him, the Holy Spirit.

Tom said:  The Holy Spirit is not a replacement or substitute for Jesus teaching.  What Jesus teaches in the Gospels, including what he teaches about the Sabbath, is what the HS must support and promote.  Period.

The words, sayings, and teachings of Jesus are also known as the “Law of Christ.”  This is the law that all Christians are under.  All that follow Christ must do so, not oppose what he teaches and then pretend they are following Christ and the HS.  Such delusion is worthless.

Today, there is no excuse for anyone to be so lazy and uneducated as to not know what Jesus teaches about the Sabbath.  The Gospels are full of Jesus’ NC Sabbath instruction, including long passages where Jesus debates the Sabbath with his religious enemies.  With such an authoritative and written record available, how can we not get it correct? 

Bob, what is the point of ignoring all this data and pretending Jesus Sabbath instruction does not exist?  Answer: To support false doctrine and worthless traditions?  It is time for all to repent of their false Sabbath views and stop playing games with the Gospel.

Bob 2 said:  Tom, you read the Bible with your assumptions in front of what are important parts of the New Covenant that is Jesus New Kingdom.

Tom said: No one is saved by reading the Bible, obeying the Law, or going to church.  Such assumptions are worthless.  Rather, it is the Gospel words of Christ, when understood and believed, that brings Eternal Life.  During one of the Sabbath debates, Jesus made this point clear to the Jews.  It is a point still valid today.

John 5:38 “You do not have His word abiding in you, for you do not believe Him whom He sent.

John 5:39 “You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; it is these that testify about Me;

John 5:40 and you are unwilling to come to Me so that you may have life.

Jesus teaches that those who reject his doctrinal authority over the law, specifically as it relates to his NC Sabbath, are rejecting God, Christ, the HS, and Eternal Life. 

No wonder the true PAJ of the last church demands that all repent.  Why?  Because every church at the end of time is wrong about the Gospel and the Sabbath.  They have all misunderstood Christ and rejected his teachings, the Sabbath being the most public and visible.

Bob 2 said:  Who said that there must be a holy day.

Tom said:  According to the Jews, God declared the 7th day to be a special religious day.  See Genesis, and the rest of the Bible.  Christ also approved the Sabbath and even claimed to be the Lord of this unique and special creation doctrine.  However, his NC view of the 7th day is very different from the OC Jews, and thus they rejected it. 

While the NC Sabbath is no longer a holy day, much less one where work is prohibited, it is still a day for Gospel fellowship and worship.  It is still a marker for the Creation Story and for the Creator, who is Jesus Christ, the Lord of the Sabbath.

Bob 2 said:  If you are into holy days, when did Jesus say the words you and I quote above??   

John 7:6 Therefore Jesus told them, “My time is not yet here; for you any time will do. 7 The world cannot hate you, but it hates me because I testify that its works are evil. 8 You go to the festival. I am not going up to this festival, because my time has not yet fully come.” 9 After he had said this, he stayed in Galilee.  10 However, after his brothers had left for the festival[Festival of Tabernacles, he went also, not publicly, but in secret. 11 Now at the festival the Jewish leaders were watching for Jesus and asking, “Where is he?”

Tom said:  Stop with the diversions.  You need to focus on the words of Jesus as they relate to the Sabbath.  Why are you so off point?  Why are you running away from the many words of Christ about the 7th day?

You should studying John 5, 9 and 10 to understand the NC Sabbath, not John 7: 37 or Romans, etc.  You must look in the proper place.

Bob 2 said: Tom, lets talk a moment about this holy day he honored by His presence, "As His custom was...". Should we keep this Holy Festival because Jesus attended it? Should we not follow His example in all ways??? What say you??

Tom said:  Stop the diversions.  What Christ teaches about the 7th day Sabbath, which is a lot, is what we must embrace.  Do not try to understand the NC Sabbath from the wrong sources. 

Rather, read John 5.  All 47 verses are part of a great Sabbath debate between Jesus and his enemies.  Then go to John 9.  Here are another 39 verses where Jesus has another Sabbath Rumble in defense of his new Sabbath doctrine.  Chapter 10 continues as an extension of John 9, and for the next 21 verses.  This is when the Good shepherd motif is connected by Christ with his reformed and active Sabbath that is for all MANKIND, through the church.

So Bob, here are more than 100 verses in John, where Christ is defending, debating, and teaching his NC view of the Sabbath.  Why did you ignore them all, choosing to focus on John 7: 37, which is not even about the Sabbath?

Let all see how the enemies of the Gospel operate.  They are blind on purpose, not wanting to see.

John 9:39 And Jesus said, “For judgment I came into this world, so that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may become blind.”

John 9:40 Those of the Pharisees who were with Him heard these things and said to Him, “We are not blind too, are we?”

John 9:41 Jesus said to them, “If you were blind, you would have no sin; but since you say, ‘We see,’ your sin remains.

John 10:1  “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who does not enter by the door into the fold of the sheep, but climbs up some other way, he is a thief and a robber.

John 10:2 “But he who enters by the door is a shepherd of the sheep.

Bob 2 said:  Jesus said nothing of keeping the Sabbath Holy in the 40 days between His resurrection and His ascension, but did appear a number of times, the first day of the week.

Tom said:  Jesus never taught that the 7th day was holy, or that no work was allowed on the 7th day.  That was his problem, at least according to the Jews.

Rather, Jesus teaches that the church is holy, not any day.  He also teaches that work is allowed on the 7th day, and that the law of the 4th Commandment is no longer binding.  He also teaches that this is the day for the church to meet in Gospel fellowship and praise.

Bob 2 said:  I am not suggesting by that, that there is any mandate for Sunday to be the Sabbath for Christians, though some claim that, of which there is no Biblical proof.

Tom said:  Most think that Sunday is a valid doctrine, when it is not.  The SDA’s are correct on this point.  The NCT crowd also believes their Every Day Sabbath has “biblical support” when it is just as absurd and unfounded as the Sunday Sabbath.

All that follow Jesus must also embrace his view of the 7th day.  This is a mandate from Christ, the Good Shepherd and the self-proclaimed Lord of the Sabbath.

Bob 2 said: As far as your mockery of "an everyday Sabbath", this is high mockery of which you are good at.

Tom said:  False doctrine deserves to be mocked and exposed so as to warn the innocent.  The NCT view of the Sabbath is easily mocked because it is so wrong and absurd.  It should be called an Every Day Sabbath because this is what is taught.  Then this hypercritical crowd always meets on Sunday.  Thus they have added false doctrine on top of false doctrine.  What’s not to mock?  NCT is laughable and ludicrous.  You have only underscored this point for all to see.

Bob 2 said: I am not saying an everyday Sabbath, but if the ultimate goal of the Christian and God/Jesus is for the Christian to REST eternally, why do you mock it so.

Tom said:  NCT teaches a 24 /7 Sabbath Rest in Christ, which moots any weekly Sabbath, either on Sunday or the 7th day.  Such doctrine is not taught by Christ.  So it is false, dangerous, and worthless. 

Jesus is not the fulfillment of the Sabbath, or any Day.  Nor did he change this weekly doctrine into an Every Day spiritual allegory as NCT teaches.  In fact, Jesus rarely uses the word rest, much less makes new Sabbath doctrine out of such a concept.  You would know this if you took the time to study the Sabbath teachings of Christ instead of hiding from them.  Everyone would know the truth about the Gospel Sabbath if they would only go to Christ in the Gospels and learn from him.

Bob 2 said:  Everyday, we can request the rest, forgiveness Jesus has made possible.

Tom said:  While the Gospel brings the forgiveness of sin and the promise of Eternal Life, it also gives us spiritual peace, as well as freedom from the guilt and power of the law.  But the Christian will not arrive at the Promised Land until the 2nd Coming has taken place.  Thus, the church on earth must remain active and alert, full of good works.  They are not to rest or sleep, but work, work, work.

John 5:17 But He answered them, “My Father is working until now, and I Myself am working.”

John 9:4 “We must work the works of Him who sent Me as long as it is day; night is coming when no one can work.

Matt. 5:16 “Let your light shine before men in such a way that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father who is in heaven.

John 14:12 “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who believes in Me, the works that I do, he will do also; and greater works than these he will do; because I go to the Father.

Matt. 9:37 Then He said to His disciples, “The harvest is plentiful, but the workers are few.

Matt. 9:38 “Therefore beseech the Lord of the harvest to send out workers into His harvest.”

3John 8 Therefore we ought to support such men, so that we may be fellow workers with the truth.

1Pet. 1:17  If you address as Father the One who impartially judges according to each one’s work, conduct yourselves in fear during the time of your stay on earth;

Eph. 2:10 For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them.

The Christian life is not about rest, but about faith and works.  Not faith and rest.  The NC Sabbath is also about Gospel faith and works, not about law keeping, guilt, or a forced rest under threat of death.

Bob 2 said:  Congregations are urged as are Christians to "assembly yourself" and not isolate ourselves from the fellowship of other believers.

Tom said:  The NC Sabbath of Christ calls for the church to meet on the 7th day.  However, this doctrine does not restrict work or travel in any way.  In fact, Jesus teaches that the OC 4th Commandment is NOT BINDING on the church.  Which means the SDA’s have been making fools of themselves for many years.

Bob 2 said:  We should not be judging by which day one assemblys on but be convinced in our own minds what we do or don't do toward  God. 

Tom said:  Ha!  This is too funny.  So you think Christians are free to ignore or revise the teachings of Christ to fit their various minds?  Really?  If this were so, why do we need Christ?  We can just make up whatever we want and believe that, which is what most people do anyway.

Does Jesus teach that the Sabbath doctrine is an individual matter?  Does he teach a Sabbath that features rest on any day, much less Every Day?  Did Christ change the 7th day Sabbath into an Every Day / No Day doctrine as NCT claims?  Hardly.  But how would you know?  You can’t seem to find where Jesus teaches anything about the Sabbath.

How can the blind see?  Answer:  They can’t.  This is the problem.

Luke 6:39  And He also spoke a parable to them: “A blind man cannot guide a blind man, can he? Will they not both fall into a pit?

Bob 2 said:  Here is the whole chapter of John 14:

Rom. 14:1  Now accept the one who is weak in faith, but not for the purpose of passing judgment on his opinions.
Rom. 14:2 One person has faith that he may eat all things, but he who is weak eats vegetables only…

Tom replied:  Wrong.  It is Roman 14 you quoted, not anything from Christ.  Here is how John 14 starts out:

John 14:1  “Do not let your heart be troubled; believe in God, believe also in Me.
John 14:2 “In My Father’s house are many dwelling places; if it were not so, I would have told you; for I go to prepare a place for you.

What you meant to say is: here is Paul, the Lord of the Sabbath.  Let all study Paul and learn the NC Sabbath from him.  He teaches that each person is free to make up whatever Sabbath doctrine they want.  So, each to their own Gospel views. 

Really?  Is this what Jesus teaches?

Bob, if you are serious about learning the Gospel Sabbath, you must go to Christ in the Gospels and learn from him.  There you will find hundreds of verses of Sabbath instruction from the Master theologian. 

However, if you are not serious about finding such truth, then you will continue to marginalize and ignore the teachings of Christ, favoring others you like better.  You will continue to embrace myth and fiction, claiming it is truth, when it is not even close.  Thus, you have chosen to be blind, just like the Jews.  Your choice my friend.

Bob 2 asked:  Last, are you by not answering who else sees this the same way as you, you are declaring yourself a prophet on equal to God/Jesus???

Tom said:  All theologians have embraced a weekly Sabbath or Lord’s day since the very beginning of the church in the Gospels.  There has never been a time when this was not so.  The NCT crowd is wrong to think there is no such weekly doctrine.  They are also very wrong to deny the teachings of Christ and pretend he does not teach a doctrine of the Sabbath for the church, when there are literally hundreds of verses in the Gospels for all to see.

The SDA’s were correct to push Sabbath Reform forward and to associate it with eschatology and the last Gospel Reformation.  Too bad they misunderstood the Gospel and are now embracing a false Sabbath and a false Judgment, and many other errors, - which is why they are self-destructing for all to see.

During the demise of the SDA’s, Dr. Ford stood true to the Gospel and for the 7th day lord’s day.  While many SDA’s embraced NCT, he refused, because he knows it is worthless fraud and error.  If anyone today is looking for a Protestant theologian that supports the 7th day Gospel Sabbath, just look to Dr. Ford.  He has been there all along.  He supports the fundamentals of the Protestant Faith, Adventist Reform, and the Gospel Sabbath.

It is time for the Advent Movement to wake up and repent.  It is time for them to correct their many false doctrines, starting with the SABBATH, and move forward to develop what the Pioneers called the 4th Angels Message.  This is the only hope for the Adventist Community.

Mark 4:23 “If anyone has ears to hear, let him hear.”

Tom Norris for Adventist Reform

Offline

#138 02-05-14 11:39 pm

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Tom said:

Tom said:  Bob, why do you refuse to learn the doctrine of the Sabbath from Christ?   He has a lot to teach on this topic.  Could it be that you don’t like what he teaches, so you refuse to acknowledge, much less embrace the NC Sabbath of Christ?

You are not being honest with the NT, nor are you searching for truth.  Why do you ignore the passages where Christ teaches about the Sabbath, and why do you go to other Gospel passages where he does not, claiming you have found the truth about the Sabbath? 

How can you claim to follow Christ, when in fact, you are running away from him and from his active and reformed doctrine of the 7th day?

Simple response with Bible passage:

Romans 14:5 One person considers one day more sacred than another; another considers every day alike. Each of them should be fully convinced in their own mind. 6 Whoever regards one day as special does so to the Lord. Whoever eats meat does so to the Lord, for they give thanks to God; and whoever abstains does so to the Lord and gives thanks to God. 7 For none of us lives for ourselves alone, and none of us dies for ourselves alone. 8 If we live, we live for the Lord; and if we die, we die for the Lord. So, whether we live or die, we belong to the Lord. 9 For this very reason, Christ died and returned to life so that he might be the Lord of both the dead and the living.

10 You, then, why do you judge your brother or sister[a]? Or why do you treat them with contempt? For we will all stand before God’s judgment seat.

Also, when Jesus spoke with the Samaritan woman at the well, He did not say anything to her about the Sabbath though they spoke about worship. Why do you suppose that was Tom??:

John 4: 7 When a Samaritan woman came to draw water, Jesus said to her, “Will you give me a drink?” 8 (His disciples had gone into the town to buy food.)

9 The Samaritan woman said to him, “You are a Jew and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?” (For Jews do not associate with Samaritans.[a])

10 Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God and who it is that asks you for a drink, you would have asked him and he would have given you living water.”

11 “Sir,” the woman said, “you have nothing to draw with and the well is deep. Where can you get this living water? 12 Are you greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well and drank from it himself, as did also his sons and his livestock?”

13 Jesus answered, “Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, 14 but whoever drinks the water I give them will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life.”

15 The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water so that I won’t get thirsty and have to keep coming here to draw water.”

16 He told her, “Go, call your husband and come back.”

17 “I have no husband,” she replied.

Jesus said to her, “You are right when you say you have no husband. 18 The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband. What you have just said is quite true.”

19 “Sir,” the woman said, “I can see that you are a prophet. 20 Our ancestors worshiped on this mountain, but you Jews claim that the place where we must worship is in Jerusalem.”

21 “Woman,” Jesus replied, “believe me, a time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. 22 You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews. 23 Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. 24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.”
25 The woman said, “I know that Messiah” (called Christ) “is coming. When he comes, he will explain everything to us.”

26 Then Jesus declared, “I, the one speaking to you—I am he.”

Tom, every opportunity was given for Jesus to broach the subject of the Sabbath, but instead talks about "where" and in what "spirit" they will worship. He revealed Himself as the Messiah but not the "Lord of the Sabbath". The topic wasn't even discussed. If you look at all the times the Sabbath comes up, it is the church leaders trying to trip Him up on the Law He was born under. That Law/Covenant was not fulfilled until His death, so he had to respond when those approaching him bring up the subject and as Lord of the Sabbath, He is in a good position to talk about the attitude to the Sabbath under the Old Covenant. As Lord of the Sabbath, He and His father "rested" on the seventh "day" of creation, but it did not have a morning and evening. He sanctified it, set it aside for a special purpose, but Adam and Eve were rewarded for their sin, labor by the sweat of their brow, with nothing said of a rest day for Adam and Eve after the fall. Jesus knows the original intent for the Sabbath in the 4th Commandment when it was given, and any shadows, symbology He intended. You are a Hyper-Sabbatarian that can not be supported in Jesus attitude or anywhere else in the NT/NC. It was a non topic the further the Christians got from the Jews and their attempt to make the Sabbath the issue, not the Messiah. You appear to have adopted the same stance. What a shame!!!

Offline

#139 02-05-14 11:47 pm

tom_norris
Adventist Reform
From: Silver Spring, Md
Registered: 01-02-09
Posts: 877
Website

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Matt. 7:6  “Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, or they will trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.

John 9:39 And Jesus said, “For judgment I came into this world, so that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may become blind.”

John 9:40 Those of the Pharisees who were with Him heard these things and said to Him, “We are not blind too, are we?”

John 9:41 Jesus said to them, “If you were blind, you would have no sin; but since you say, ‘We see,’ your sin remains.

John 10:1  “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who does not enter by the door into the fold of the sheep, but climbs up some other way, he is a thief and a robber.

John 10:2 “But he who enters by the door is a shepherd of the sheep.

John 10:3 “To him the doorkeeper opens, and the sheep hear his voice, and he calls his own sheep by name and leads them out.

John 10:4 “When he puts forth all his own, he goes ahead of them, and the sheep follow him because they know his voice.

John 10:5 “A stranger they simply will not follow, but will flee from him, because they do not know the voice of strangers.”

Offline

#140 02-06-14 12:32 am

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Tom Wells in the book New Covenant Theology states that he had a friendly challenge of NCT by a Reformed Baptist minister, Richard Barcello, author of In "In Defense of the Decalogue: A Critique of New Covenant Theology". So Tom you are not the first to take NCT on. I will present some of his defense he presents in Chapter 11 of "New Covenant Theology".

The author, Barcello, gets right to the point early in his book, whether the law written on the hearts of New Covenant believers is the Decalogue. "The issue under consideration is what Jeremiah meant when he said in Jeremiah 31:31-34 that 'I will put MY LAW [emphasis added by Barcello] in there minds, and write it on their hearts' "(pg 15) He adds, "Most New Covenant theologians would not identify the law written on the heartin Jeremiah 31:33 as the Decalogue"(pg 16).

Wells is surprised that Barcello does not present the discussion of whether the Decalogue had continuity into the New Covenant. Wells then tells a "parable" that gets to what he feels is the heart of the issue. He uses the metamorphosis of the caterpillar turning to a butterfly.

Wells states:

"Briefly put, it amounts to this: all of the OT, including the Old Covenant, is prophetic of Christ. In this view, the Lord Jesus in his person, his work, his teaching and his body (i.e., the church) provides the fulfillment of the entire history of redemption as contained in the OT. The Old Covenant is the caterpillar and the New Covenant of the Lord Jesus is the butterfly. Alternately we may say that the various parts of the Old Covenant are caterpillars (plural)and various facets of the New Covenant are butterflies. This is the typological approach. It can be seen, for example, in giving the Lord Jesus the names prophet, priest and king. The OT prophet played caterpillar to the Lord Jesus butterfly! So too the OT priest and king. ... If one side prefers to speak what we might call "caterpillar language" using perpetuity and God's law revealed to Israel as his Old Covenant nation (both descriptions lifted from Barcellos in describing his own position), they are free to do so. The other side, however, must be free to use "butterfly language,"and speak of Christ as new lawgiver and a higher and more spiritual law than the law of Moses (all descriptions lifted from Barcellos in describing NCT).

Let me make a point of clarification here. Tom Norris believes as I do, that the Decalogue ceases to be the Law of the New Covenant, while Hubb Sturges believes the Decalogue is God's eternal law and has continuity from OC to NC. Tom, has a rather unique view that at least the Sabbath of the 4th Commandment is "reformed" to a day of "work" not "inactivity".  The rest of the law that Tom believes reigns in the New Covenant is unclear since his emphasis has been so heavily on  his "Reformed Sabbath" which is nowhere to be found in the NT/NC. Maybe Tom can clarify for us, what he believes Christ's Law to be as referenced in the NT/NC.

Last edited by bob_2 (02-07-14 12:25 am)

Offline

#141 02-08-14 3:51 pm

tom_norris
Adventist Reform
From: Silver Spring, Md
Registered: 01-02-09
Posts: 877
Website

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Bob 2 said:  Tom Wells in the book New Covenant Theology states that he had a friendly challenge of NCT by a Reformed Baptist minister, Richard Barcello, author of In "In Defense of the Decalogue: A Critique of New Covenant Theology".  So Tom you are not the first to take NCT on. I will present some of his defense he presents in Chapter 11 of "New Covenant Theology".

Tom said:  I have never claimed to be the first to repudiate NCT.  Many Sunday keeping theologians have done this, some in a very public manner, like Dr. RC Sproul.

An Open Letter to Dr. R.C. Sproul
http://solochristo.com/theology/nct/rei … sproul.htm

Good for this NCT crowd to recognize that no church or denomination has a credible or correct doctrine of the Sabbath or Lord’s Day.  Not the Sunday keepers and certainly not the SDA’s. 

Not only do I agree with this assessment, but also I congratulate these theologians for trying to find correct doctrine.  The problem, however, is that their proposed solution is also very wrong. 

It is easy to find fault and error, but more difficult to find truth.    Adventist Reform has not only exposed NCT as error and myth, it has also, and more importantly, articulated the correct NC Sabbath for the church.  This is what matters; - the truth about the 7th day Gospel Sabbath, which is the completion of Sabbath Reform.

NCT has pushed the Sabbath debate forward, and for that, we should all be thankful.  Let all those that correctly repudiated the OC Sabbath of the SDA’s and embraced the Every Day Sabbath of NCT, repent and move forward to understand the true doctrine of the Sabbath as taught by Christ in the Gospels.

Bob 2 said: The author, Barcello, gets right to the point early in his book, whether the law written on the hearts of New Covenant believers is the Decalogue.

http://solochristo.com/theology/nct/ada … oc35080097

Tom said:  Really?  Why is this point the “heart of the matter?”  When it comes to a definition of the Gospel, the law cannot be the point.  It is only viewed as such by those who are legalists.   Faith in Christ is what saves, not law keeping.  So faith in the words of Christ is the real “point.”  Not anything about law.

Bob 2 said:  "The issue under consideration is what Jeremiah meant when he said in Jeremiah 31:31-34 that 'I will put MY LAW [emphasis added by Barcello] in there minds, and write it on their hearts' "(pg 15) He adds, "Most New Covenant theologians would not identify the law written on the heart in Jeremiah 31:33 as the Decalogue"(pg 16).

Tom said:  Wrong.  When it comes to understanding the Gospel, it is a mistake to turn to the OC for answers or instruction.  Jeremiah was not an Apostle, much less a Christian, so you are confused and disoriented about your sources.

The Gospel begins and ends with Christ.  What he teaches about law and Gospel, as well as the Sabbath, and everything else, is what the church must understand and follow.  Forget reading Moses or Jeremiah, or even Paul.  Go to the Gospels and learn from Christ.  His words take first priority for all Gospel doctrine.

After understanding the words of Christ, you may then move on to learn more about Jesus from the rest of the NT, including Paul.  But it all starts, and ends, with the words, teachings, and sayings of Christ, the Lord of the Sabbath and the head theologian of the church.

Bob 2 said:  Wells is surprised that Barcello does not present the discussion of whether the Decalogue had continuity into the New Covenant.

Tom said:  While the Moral Law still exists in the NC, it does so in a subordinated manner to Faith in Christ.  No Christian is under the Moral law for salvation.  Nor will they ever be.

Bob 2 said:  Wells then tells a "parable" that gets to what he feels is the heart of the issue. He uses the metamorphosis of the caterpillar turning to a butterfly.

Tom said:  Theologians should stick to the parables of Christ to make their Gospel points.   While there were many caterpillars in Jesus day, Christ refused to use this insect in any of his Gospel parables.  In fact, the Bible has a negative view of caterpillars, not one that is flattering or pretty, much less fit to describe the Messiah.

Amos 4:9 “I smote you with scorching wind and mildew;
    And the caterpillar was devouring
    Your many gardens and vineyards, fig trees and olive trees;
Yet you have not returned to Me,” declares the LORD.

Matt. 6:19  “Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal.


http://www.nature-of-oz.com/butterflies.htm

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Categ … _of_Israel


Let all be careful not to go beyond what Christ teaches.  If Jesus refused to compare himself, or the OC, to a caterpillar, moth, or butterfly, then no one should do it today, least of all to explain the Gospel.   No one is called to invent new doctrine or place new words in the mouth of Christ.

Moreover, rather then make up useless parables; why not use the parables and sayings of Christ to make whatever points necessary.  Thus, Christ should be viewed as a Good Shepherd with an active and reformed Sabbath, and we like sheep that follow his words.  Here is a correct parable from Christ that makes the proper point.  No need to invent anything new, much less to teach that NC theology is based on catipillars and butterflies.  Pitiful.

Bob2 posted:  Wells states: "Briefly put, it amounts to this: all of the OT, including the Old Covenant, is prophetic of Christ.

Tom replied:  Wrong.  The OT tells the story of God’s interaction with mankind, starting from creation.  Thus there are many, many points that are not “prophetic of Christ.”  Was the flood a type of Christ? Were the evil nations, like the Hittites, prophetic of Christ?  Hardly.  This is an absurd point of view.  Typology is not a safe way to understand Gospel theology.

ALL of the OT cannot be reduced to being “prophetic of Christ.”  That is utter nonsense.

Wells states: In this view, the Lord Jesus in his person, his work, his teaching and his body (i.e., the church) provides the fulfillment of the entire history of redemption as contained in the OT.

Tom said:  Double-talk, error, and fiction.  How can all the sin, war, famine, and death be prophetic of Christ?  History is not to be confused with prophecy.  Nor is the Gospel to be understood by such false hermeneutics.

Wells said:  The Old Covenant is the caterpillar and the New Covenant of the Lord Jesus is the butterfly.

Tom said:  Stop with the insect lessons.  Entomology is not part of theology.  Jesus is not a Butterfly, nor is he the fulfillment of the Sabbath, as NCT claims.

Wells said:  Alternately we may say that the various parts of the Old Covenant are caterpillars (plural) and various facets of the New Covenant are butterflies.

Tom said:  Stop with this absurd talk about insects.  It is worthless theology from those promoting false doctrine.

Wells said:  This is the typological approach. It can be seen, for example, in giving the Lord Jesus the names prophet, priest and king. The OT prophet played caterpillar to the Lord Jesus butterfly!

Tom said:  Such a hermeneutical approach is reckless and wrong, unworthy of the Gospel of Christ.  OC Prophets are not caterpillars, nor is Christ a Butterfly.  The Gospel is above such trite and silly talk. 

Wells said:  So too the OT priest and king. ... If one side prefers to speak what we might call "caterpillar language" using perpetuity and God's law revealed to Israel as his Old Covenant nation (both descriptions lifted from Barcellos in describing his own position), they are free to do so. The other side, however, must be free to use "butterfly language," and speak of Christ as new lawgiver and a higher and more spiritual law than the law of Moses (all descriptions lifted from Barcellos in describing NCT).

Tom said:  Luther correctly warns that it is a great mistake to think of Christ as if he were a new lawgiver, like an improved version of Moses.  He is not a “sheriff,” but the savior of the world.  He did not come to condemn or enforce the law, but to teach the Gospel and save sinners.

Once the point is established that Christ is our savior, by faith, it is correct to teach that the Law of Christ is what all Christians should follow and obey.  Not the Law of Moses, but the law of Christ.  Thus, there is an “obedience of faith” that is expected from those that follow Christ.

Rom. 1:5 through whom we have received grace and apostleship to bring about the obedience of faith among all the Gentiles for His name’s sake,

Rom. 16:26 but now is manifested, and by the Scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the eternal God, has been made known to all the nations, leading to obedience of faith;

Gal. 6:2 Bear one another’s burdens, and thereby fulfill the law of Christ.

Many fail to comprehend that Jesus teaches an active and reformed, 7th day Sabbath as part of his Gospel law.  Thus, the law of Christ includes the NC Sabbath of Christ.

Bob 2 said:  Let me make a point of clarification here. Tom Norris believes as I do, that the Decalogue ceases to be the Law of the New Covenant, while Hubb Sturges believes the Decalogue is God's eternal law and has continuity from OC to NC.

Tom said:  This is a correct assessment.  Good for you to get this correct!

Bob 2 said:  Tom has a rather unique view that at least the Sabbath of the 4th Commandment is "reformed" to a day of "work" not "inactivity". 

Tom replied:  The Gospels clearly and repeatedly show Jesus teaching an active and reformed 7th day Sabbath.  This was such a featured and “unique” doctrine that the Jews could not understand nor embrace it. 

The Gentiles had no such problem with the active Sabbath of Christ, which is why the Gentile soldiers and slaves could embrace the Christian Faith without having to try and obey the Sabbath like the Jews, - a point that would have been impossible for them.

So yes, the NC Sabbath of Christ is very unique, surprising, and amazing doctrine.  The Jews never saw it coming, and neither does the church today.  The 7th day Gospel Sabbath will once again upset the status quo, exposing religious error and fraud on a universal scale for all to see in the last days.

While I admit that no church or denomination teaches a correct view of the 7th day Sabbath, this is not the real issue.  The question should be: “What doe Christ teach about the Sabbath?” 

If the church teaches what Christ teaches, then fine.  All is well.  But the fact of the matter is that the church DOES NOT teach what Christ teaches.  Which is why the PAJ demands that every church in Laodicea repent.  Tom Norris is only pointing out the Gospel facts, not inventing new doctrine.  He too is surprised that the church could be so wrong for so long. 

Moreover, how could the SDA’s get the day correct, but then misunderstand the doctrine?  How could they confuse the Sabbath of Moses with the Sabbath of Christ?  But they did. The active and reformed 7th day Lord’s Day has been in the Gospels from the beginning of the church.  It is still there today.  Only a blind person could miss it.

Bob 2 said:  The rest of the law that Tom believes reigns in the New Covenant is unclear since his emphasis has been so heavily on the his "Reformed Sabbath" which is nowhere to be found in the NT/NC.

Tom replied:  First, unless one can understand the NC Sabbath correctly, it will be impossible to fully understand the Gospel.  So it is critical.

Second, the teachings of Jesus about salvation, behavior, and eschatology, and all else, including his position on the Sabbath, make up the law of Christ.  The Christian is to follow what Jesus teaches, not what Moses teaches, or anyone else.  Eternal Life is only through faith in Christ’s Gospel, nothing else.

Third, those that deny the Gospel Sabbath of Christ, which is what the Jew did, lost Eternal Life and were ruined.  The same fate awaits any today that also deny Christ, and his NC Sabbath.  Let all beware false doctrine.

Bob 2 said:  Maybe Tom can clarify for us, what he believes Christ's Law to be as reference in the NT/NC.

Tom said:  What Jesus teaches about everything, from love to the Judgment to the Afterlife, represents the law of Christ.  There is no point that is not covered by the teachings of Christ, aka, the law of Christ.

In conclusion, it is time for the Adventist Community to wake up, repent, and move forward in truth to develop the final Gospel message that will prepare the church for the great Tribulation, which is closer than ever.

Matt. 24:42  “Therefore be on the alert, for you do not know which day your Lord is coming.

Matt. 24:43 “But be sure of this, that if the head of the house had known at what time of the night the thief was coming, he would have been on the alert and would not have allowed his house to be broken into.

Matt. 24:44 “For this reason you also must be ready; for the Son of Man is coming at an hour when you do not think He will. 

Mark 4:23 “If anyone has ears to hear, let him hear.”

Tom Norris, for Adventist Reform

Last edited by tom_norris (02-08-14 8:29 pm)

Offline

#142 02-08-14 11:59 pm

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Tom, I looked around at others that were taking note of the discussion with RC Sproul, a conservative on the Westminister Confession that states it's position on the 4th Commandment in terms that could be declared "man made law" . Read it for yourself:   http://www.reformed.org/documents/wcf_with_proofs/     Particularly Article VII. To declare others antinomian and believe in how the Sabbath gets from seventh to first day of  the week for entirely different reasons than given in Exodus 20 and Deut 5. This is revisionist history and man-making of laws at it's worst. R.C. Sproul is more intelligent than this. Note also this excerpt from another scholar's position:


Where is Theology Going?
An Overview of New Covenant Theology
By Andrew R. Rappaport
 
".......

New Covenant Theology would find the source of God’s law in His unchanging moral character.
God’s law, as an eternal standard, cannot change. Therefore, it could never become any less
binding a rule of life. Tom Schreiner notes the distinction in his discussion on the moral norms
of the new covenant.

Believers are subject to the law of Christ, and the law of Christ is discerned from
the NT. Wells and Zaspel maintain that many of the moral norms of the OT (nine
of the ten commandments of the Decalogue) continue to be normative. They are
normative, however, because they are part of Christ’s law, not because they hail
from the Mosaic law.11

This view is depends [sic] on the New Testament to define the law of Christ as to what of the law is
applied to believers in the church.

What is ironic, this scholar is declaring God's standard as "immutable" but lets the Sabbath law be
changed by mere mortal hands as stated in the Westminster Confession. For me the fulfillment by
Jesus as our REST from striving for forgiveness is a more salient view.

Last edited by bob_2 (02-09-14 12:14 am)

Offline

#143 02-09-14 12:11 am

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Note, as was brought out by this discussion, that NCT is not the purveyor of any holy days. The church can congregate as they gain consensus.

Offline

#144 02-09-14 9:43 pm

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Tom said:

Third, those that deny the Gospel Sabbath of Christ, which is what the Jew did, lost Eternal Life and were ruined.  The same fate awaits any today that also deny Christ, and his NC Sabbath.  Let all beware false doctrine.

Tom, the Jews didn't fail in their unbelief of a Reformed Sabbath, but a rejection that Jesus was the Messiah. The Sabbath was one issue that Jesus said that He was doing His Father's will. You can not find after His death and with the Holy Spirit's inspiration, an emphasis on a "Reformed Sabbath". Christ did many things under the Old Covenant that are not to be copied by Christians under the New Covenant. You know this very well, but continue to play like you don't. Show the texts of support or quit claiming your Reformed Sabbath. Look at the issues surrounding the episode in Acts 18:4-6:

Acts18:4 Every Sabbath he reasoned in the synagogue, trying to persuade Jews and Greeks.

5 When Silas and Timothy came from Macedonia, Paul devoted himself exclusively to preaching, testifying to the Jews that Jesus was the Messiah. 6 But when they opposed Paul and became abusive, he shook out his clothes in protest and said to them, “Your blood be on your own heads! I am innocent of it. From now on I will go to the Gentiles.”

This is why those accepting the Messiah turned to the Gentiles, not over your "trumped up" Reformed Sabbath that no one else teaches. The only others that teach a Sabbath in the New Covenant are those not believing in the discontinuity of the Decalogue being replaced by Christ's Law.

Last edited by bob_2 (02-09-14 9:50 pm)

Offline

#145 02-10-14 12:23 pm

tom_norris
Adventist Reform
From: Silver Spring, Md
Registered: 01-02-09
Posts: 877
Website

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Bob 2 said:  Tom, I looked around at others that were taking note of the discussion with RC Sproul; a conservative on the Westminster Confession that states it's position on the 4th Commandment in terms that could be declared "man made law." 

Tom replied:  Look at Chapter 19, Law of God.  Here the Moral law is defended and viewed as binding on all, including the Sabbath, which they claim was changed to Sunday by Christ.  (See Chapter 21, Religious Worship and the Sabbath)

The Westminster Confession of Faith on the Law, Chapter 19

V. The moral law does forever bind all, as well justified persons as others, to the obedience thereof;[8] and that, not only in regard of the matter contained in it, but also in respect of the authority of God the Creator, who gave it.[9] Neither does Christ, in the Gospel, any way dissolve, but much strengthen this obligation.[10]

VI. Although true believers be not under the law, as a covenant of works, to be thereby justified, or condemned;[11] yet is it of great use to them, as well as to others; in that, as a rule of life informing them of the will of God, and their duty, it directs and binds them to walk accordingly;[12] discovering also the sinful pollutions of their nature, hearts and lives;[13] so as, examining themselves thereby, they may come to further conviction of, humiliation for, and hatred against sin,[14] together with a clearer sight of the need they have of Christ, and the perfection of His obedience.[15]

It is likewise of use to the regenerate, to restrain their corruptions, in that it forbids sin:[16] and the threatenings of it serve to show what even their sins deserve; and what afflictions, in this life, they may expect for them, although freed from the curse thereof threatened in the law.[17] The promises of it, in like manner, show them God's approbation of obedience, and what blessings they may expect upon the performance thereof:[18] although not as due to them by the law as a covenant of works.[19] So as, a man's doing good, and refraining from evil, because the law encourages to the one and deters from the other, is no evidence of his being under the law: and not under grace.[20]

VII. Neither are the forementioned uses of the law contrary to the grace of the Gospel, but do sweetly comply with it;[21] the Spirit of Christ subduing and enabling the will of man to do that freely, and cheerfully, which the will of God, revealed in the law, requires to be done.[22]

http://www.reformed.org/documents/wcf_with_proofs/

Moreover, chapter 21 not only upholds the weekly doctrine of the Sabbath, but also claims that Christ changed the 7th day to the 1st.  See for yourself:

The Westminster Confession of Faith, Chapter 21; Religious Worship and the Sabbath Day.

VII. As it is the law of nature, that, in general, a due proportion of time be set apart for the worship of God; so, in His Word, by a positive, moral, and perpetual commandment binding all men in all ages, He has particularly appointed one day in seven, for a Sabbath, to be kept holy unto him:[34] which, from the beginning of the world to the resurrection of Christ, was the last day of the week: and, from the resurrection of Christ, was changed into the first day of the week,[35] which, in Scripture, is called the Lord's Day,[36] and is to be continued to the end of the world, as the Christian Sabbath.[37]

VIII. This Sabbath is to be kept holy unto the Lord when men, after a due preparing of their hearts, and ordering of their common affairs beforehand, do not only observe an holy rest all the day from their own works, words, and thoughts about their worldly employments and recreations,[38] but also are taken up the whole time in the public and private exercises of His worship, and in the duties of necessity and mercy.[39]

http://www.reformed.org/documents/wcf_with_proofs/

Everywhere one looks, whatever the church or denomination, there is great error about the Sabbath.  Like I said, NCT is correct to understand this fact.  But their proposed solution is as wrong as the error they are trying to correct.  They too have embraced a false view of the Sabbath.

Bob 2 said:  Read it for yourself:  Particularly Article VII.

http://www.reformed.org/documents/wcf_with_proofs/ 

Tom replied:  Sorry, but this is the wrong section.  You need to read chapters 19 & 21 that speak about the Moral Law and the Sabbath.   They have been quoted above.

Bob 2 said:  To declare others antinomian and believe in how the Sabbath gets from seventh to first day of the week for entirely different reasons than given in Exodus 20 and Deut 5. This is revisionist history and man-making of laws at it's worst. R.C. Sproul is more intelligent than this.

Tom replied:  First, don’t get me involved with the many absurd positions from others about the Sabbath.  No one has this doctrine correct, (except for Adventist Reform), which is why there is so much confusion and double-talk associated with this Sabbath debate.  There is error everywhere about the Sabbath.

Second, the Westminster Confession is WRONG to state that Jesus changed the Sabbath to Sunday.  Even the NCT crowd has correctly dismissed this position as error, not just the SDA’s.  The Sunday Lord’s day is a massive scam, of which there can be no doubt.  But so too is what the SDA’s teach about the Sabbath.  So all are full of error.

Third, I understand why some would call NCT antinomian, even though most everyone has changed the Sabbath law to Sunday, which would seem to make them antinomian.  Most all were taught Sunday is sacred, and tradition dies hard.  NCT is going against tradition, and thus they pay the typical price.  Too bad they are wrong with their proposed correction.  But they must be given credit for exposing the Sunday error, and for pushing the debate forward, even though their conclusion is wrong.

Adventist Reform promotes the active and reformed 7th day Sabbath of Christ; this is the correct, NC view.  There is no other Gospel view.

Bob 2 said:  Note also this excerpt from another scholar's position:  Where is Theology Going? 
An Overview of New Covenant Theology,
 By Andrew R. Rappaport 
 


".......New Covenant Theology would find the source of God’s law in His unchanging moral character. 
God’s law, as an eternal standard, cannot change. Therefore, it could never become any less binding a rule of life.”

Tom said; The eternal standard and source for God is the person Jesus Christ.  Not the law.  Jesus most fully and accurately reflects God and his character, not the OC Moral law. 

John 14:8  Philip said to Him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us.”

John 14:9 Jesus said to him, “Have I been so long with you, and yet you have not come to know Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?

When God speaks to mankind in the 1st century, he does not point them to the OC Moral Law, but to Christ.

Luke 9:35 Then a voice came out of the cloud, saying, “This is My Son, My Chosen One; listen to Him!”

Heb. 1:1   God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways,

Heb. 1:2   in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world.

Heb. 1:3 And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power. When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high,

Jesus, and the Gospel, is greater than the law.

Bob 2 said:  Tom Schreiner notes the distinction in his discussion on the moral norms of the new covenant. Believers are subject to the law of Christ, and the law of Christ is discerned from the NT.

Tom said:  This is correct.  However, the “law of Christ” includes what he teaches about the 7th day Sabbath.  Jesus does not teach an Every Day allegorical Sabbath, much less a Sunday Sabbath.  Nor does he claim to be the “fulfillment” of the Sabbath, as NCT teaches.

Why are so many confused, following false doctrine?  Why are so many repudiating Christ and ignoring his words?

Bob 2 posted:  Wells and Zaspel maintain that many of the moral norms of the OT (nine 
of the ten commandments of the Decalogue) continue to be normative.

Tom said:  Christ embraces, defends, and protects the moral law, even applying this law to our thoughts as well as to our actions.  Jesus deals with all 10 commandments, especially the 4th, which Christ masterfully changes into a very different NC doctrine for all to see.

Bob 2 posted:  They are normative, however, because they are part of Christ’s law, not because they hail 
from the Mosaic law.11

Tom said:  Wrong.  The context for the NC is the OC.  They are not independent from each other.  Jesus was a Jew, and thus he thought like a Jew, which means he had to deal with the law, which he does.

Jesus supports and upholds all 10 Commandments, changing the Sabbath into an active doctrine that would have brought condemnation to all but the OC Priests.  He did not remove the 7th day from being special, nor did he make it into an Every Day doctrine.  Rather, he transformed it into an active and special Gospel day, where freedom in Christ trumps the guilt and power of the Moral law.

Bob 2 posted: This view is depends [sic] on the New Testament to define the law of Christ as to what of the law is 
applied to believers in the church.

Tom said:  While the NCT crowd is very correct to point to the law of Christ instead of the 10 C’s, they are blind fools for overlooking what Jesus, the self-proclaimed Lord of the Sabbath, teaches about the Sabbath.  The Gospels are full of Jesus NC Sabbath instruction.  There will be no excuse for anyone on the Day of Judgment to get this wrong.  To do so means they are following a false Christ.  So to get this doctrine is fatal.

Bob 2 said:  What is ironic, this scholar is declaring God's standard as "immutable" but lets the Sabbath law be changed by mere mortal hands as stated in the Westminster Confession.

Tom said:  Today, every official view of the Sabbath is “ironic” and wrong.  No church has mastered the doctrine of the Gospel Sabbath.  Most can’t even get the Day correct; much less understand the actual NC Sabbath.  Not even the SDA’s.  They are the worst of all, having actually embraced the Sabbath of Christ’s enemies that sent him to the cross. 

Wow!  What a mistake the SDA’s have made.  To misunderstand the Sabbath doctrine is fatal.  It shows who is following the genuine Christ is who has embraced a fraud.  The sheep that follow the imposter will die.

Bob 2 said: For me the fulfillment by Jesus as our REST from striving for forgiveness is a more salient view.

Tom said:  Your personal views my give you some comfort, but they are dead wrong.  You have embraced a false and impossible view of Christ, and his Gospel Sabbath.  Which means you are not following the genuine Christ of the Gospels.

While Jesus gives his followers the assurance and hope of Eternal Life as well as spiritual rest from the guilt and condemnation of the law, he is not the fulfillment of the Sabbath, whatever that is supposed to mean.  Such views are mythical, confused, and false, without any historical foundation or theological substance.

When it comes to the law of the 4th Commandment, Jesus has gone on record, over and over in the Gospels, explaining and teaching his NC view of the 7th day Sabbath for the church.  Thus the church is not free to “congregate on any day.”  Nor are they free to make up any doctrine, much less repudiate what Christ, the Lord of the Sabbath teaches about the 7th day.

Christ teaches no such “free for all, do whatever you want’ doctrine, much less about the Sabbath.  Any that think they have been given permission by Christ to invent their own personal doctrine, about anything, much less the Sabbath, are delusional and lost.

While many assume Jesus has little to say about the Sabbath, they will be stunned to learn he has much to say.  Far more than Paul, or any of the NT writers combined! 

In fact, while Paul hardly mentions the Sabbath, the Gospels contain HUNDREDS of verses where Jesus teaches, defends, and promotes a NC doctrine of the 7th day Sabbath for the church. 

I repeat; there are HUNDREDS of verses in the Gospels where Jesus teaches the NC Sabbath.  Only those who are blind, like the Jews, could miss all these holy words from Christ.

Those who are serious about following Christ for Eternal Life had better start paying very close attention to what the Good Shepherd teaches about the Gospel Sabbath and what he does not.

Make a mistake on this point and it will be fatal.  Why?  Because those so-called Christians who refuse to listen to the Lord of the Sabbath about the 4th Commandment are following a false Christ and a worthless Gospel.  They are being “lead astray” from Christ, who alone can save them.  Beware false doctrine.

Mark 13:22 for false Christs and false prophets will arise, and will show signs and wonders, in order to lead astray, if possible, the elect.

Bob 2 said: Tom, the Jews didn't fail in their unbelief of a Reformed Sabbath, but a rejection that Jesus was the Messiah.

Tom replied:  The Jews rejected Jesus’ NC Sabbath as well as the rest of his Gospel teachings.  Jesus teaches that to reject his view of the Sabbath is to reject God and the Gospel and to be removed from the kingdom of God.  In fact, the Sabbath was the reason why the Jews sent Jesus to the cross.

Bob 2 said:  The Sabbath was one issue that Jesus said that He was doing His Father's will.

Tom said:  The Jews rejected and would not believe the Gospel Sabbath of Christ.  They claimed Jesus was “insane” and was motivated by the devil.  Thus, he could not be the Messiah, and they killed him to prove this point.  Those today that refuse to embrace the active and reformed Sabbath of Christ will be as lost as the Jews.

Bob 2 said:  You cannot find after His death and with the Holy Spirit's inspiration, an emphasis on a "Reformed Sabbath".

Tom said:  The Gospel words of Christ will be the basis for our examination in the Judgment.  Not the words of Paul or anyone else.

Mark 8:38 “For whoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will also be ashamed of him when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels.”

John 14:24 “He who does not love Me does not keep My words; and the word which you hear is not Mine, but the Father’s who sent Me.

John 12:48 “He who rejects Me and does not receive My sayings, has one who judges him; the word I spoke is what will judge him at the last day.

Those who deny the words of Christ about his active and reformed 7th day Sabbath, or anything else, will be locked out of the kingdom of God.  Thus the NCT crowd is heading to hell, and so too everyone else who is blind to the Gospel teachings of Christ.

Bob 2 said:  Christ did many things under the Old Covenant that are not to be copied by Christians under the New Covenant. You know this very well, but continue to play like you don't.

Tom said:  While Jesus was a circumcised Jew, and thus was part of the OC system of the Jews, what he teaches in the Gospels is for the church.  That is why the Gospels were written.  His NC Sabbath teaching was for the church, both Jew and Gentile.  Jesus makes this clear over and over in the Gospels.  The fact that so many are evil and blind to his words is the real problem.

Bob 2 said:  Show the texts of support or quit claiming your Reformed Sabbath.

Tom said:  You must be blind to have missed all these passages about the NC Sabbath?  That would be the only explanation for such a question.

Bob 2 said:  Look at the issues surrounding the episode in Acts 18:4-6:

Tom said:  You need to first look to Jesus in the Gospels to understand the NC Sabbath of Christ.  If you fail to do this, then you have no one to blame for your ignorance, but yourself.  Those who can’t understand Christ, have no business trying to find others to say what they want to hear.  This is pointless, because only Christ, the Lord of the 7th day Sabbath, can save anyone.  Go to Christ and learn the Gospel; no one else.

Bob 2 said:  This is why those accepting the Messiah turned to the Gentiles, not over your "trumped up" Reformed Sabbath that no one else teaches.

Tom said:  The apostles turned to the Gentiles because the Jews refused to embrace Christ or his NC view of the Gospel Sabbath.  Of course they would have gone to the Gentiles regardless, as this was the plan of God all along.  But it could have been under better circumstances.

While you claim the NCS is myth, it can easily be found in all four Gospels.  In fact, there are HUNDREDS of texts in the Gospels where Jesus is teaching, defending, and promoting his active and reformed NC Sabbath.  You can pretend you are blind all you want, this is what the Jews did about the Gospel Sabbath.  However, it makes more sense to ask God to heal your blindness, if it is not already too late.  Then you too can see and understand the amazing Gospel of Christ, with its' active and free doctrine of the 7th day Sabbath.

Mark 10:51 And answering him, Jesus said, “What do you want Me to do for you?” And the blind man said to Him, “Rabboni, I want to regain my sight!”

Bob 2 said:  The only others that teach a Sabbath in the New Covenant are those not believing in the discontinuity of the Decalogue being replaced by Christ's Law.

Tom said:  Who cares what others teach?  Only what Christ teaches matters.  Jesus is the only one that gives Eternal Life.  All must make their peace with him, carefully understanding and following his words.  He is the Judge; we are to be judged by him.  Those who deny his NC Sabbath will fail at the Judgment.  Sad.

In conclusion, it is time for all to stop playing games with the Gospel, repent, and get serious about what Jesus teaches.  Let all rejoice that at long last, the genuine doctrine of the NC, 7th day Sabbath has been found for all to see.

Mark 4:23 “If anyone has ears to hear, let him hear.”

Tom Norris for Adventist Reform

Last edited by tom_norris (02-10-14 5:22 pm)

Offline

#146 02-10-14 9:35 pm

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Chapter XXI, Article VII is the right section.  R.C. Sproul believes the Decalogue has continuity through both Covenants, against what the Bible teaches. He strains to keep it, the 4th Commandment Sabbath, by declaring Sunday the worship day for Christian's in memorial of Jesus' Resurrection the central doctrine of the Christian faith, BTW without any Biblical grounds.  John Reisinger never says that any day is holy or sinful to keep. Who is in more error. Reisinger just points out that the O/C does not have continuity into the N/C. The curtain in the Most Holy Place was torn from top to bottom where the Jewish glory was to abide with a copy of the 10 Commandments.

Tom, your argument is unique and no other has ever mentioned it to me. You believe that Jesus when He said in John 5:

John 5:16 So, because Jesus was doing these things on the Sabbath, the Jewish leaders began to persecute him. 17 In his defense Jesus said to them, “My Father is always at his work to this very day, and I too am working.” 18 For this reason they tried all the more to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.

that he was declaring the New Covenant needed a Sabbath, your first mistake, and that it should be worked on, your second mistake. Also you claim Christ was killed over the Sabbath issue. Read the last phrase, "but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God."  This was the issue and it remained the issue even when Paul shook his clothes and went to preach to the gentiles, it wasn't about the Sabbath, but being abused because of this message. They rejected Jesus as the Messiah. See Acts 18:

Acts 18:1 After this, Paul left Athens and went to Corinth. 2 There he met a Jew named Aquila, a native of Pontus, who had recently come from Italy with his wife Priscilla, because Claudius had ordered all Jews to leave Rome. Paul went to see them, 3 and because he was a tentmaker as they were, he stayed and worked with them. 4 Every Sabbath he reasoned in the synagogue, trying to persuade Jews and Greeks.

5 When Silas and Timothy came from Macedonia, Paul devoted himself exclusively to preaching, testifying to the Jews that Jesus was the Messiah. 6 But when they opposed Paul and became abusive, he shook out his clothes in protest and said to them, “Your blood be on your own heads! I am innocent of it. From now on I will go to the Gentiles.”

He never argued when to meet, that was never an issue, but Jesus being the Messiah was the Gospel that the Jews rejected, except for a remnant  (see Romans 11).

NCT is not making an issue over a day, but arguing that a day is not more important than the Savior. Covenant Theologians argue for the continuation of a Sabbath, at the extremes of appointing another day for a new unbiblically based reason and appearing to try to change "times and laws". NCT lets the Bible speak for itself. With all due respect, it doesn't need a Reformed Sabbath Movement which you are pushing. Jesus' life had many examples of things that we are not expected to do as Christians, "keeping" a Sabbath is one that Jesus never spoke in an anticipatory way of it being part of His kingdom but of being fulfilled by Himself, the sin forgiver, and rest from our labor of trying to save ourselves by good works.  Read this passage, is He not our Sabbath Rest:

Matthew 11:28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.

29 Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.

30 For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.

Last edited by bob_2 (02-10-14 11:49 pm)

Offline

#147 02-11-14 12:06 am

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Tom, was Samson unique, more unique than the Jews???  Judges 13 tells how even his mother was restricted before conception regarding what she could eat or drink. Did every Israelite have to do the same? Did any Gentile need to do the same? So, the Jews were a unique people, required to follow certain laws, regulations and ordinances. Gentiles did not have to. Will Gentiles be saved without following the restrictions of the Nazarites or the Israelites??? Of course. You wish to set up your own Reformed Sabbath that is unbiblical when the Bible shows how Jesus would give those that follow Him rest. Everyday, Tom, if you will. What is wrong with everyday "rest" from striving to be saved by our own efforts??? There is nothing wrong with Dr. Sturges keeping a cozy Sabbath that gives him pleasure, but it is another thing to suggest that the Plan of Salvation  requires it. The Jews met the two requirements for Sabbath keeping. They were created by God, and they were delivered from Egypt. No other people are that unique, not even SDAs. They can adopt rules as tight as the Nazarites, but they are not salvific, healthy maybe, but long hair, not so much!!!! LOL

Last edited by bob_2 (02-11-14 12:08 am)

Offline

#148 02-11-14 4:07 am

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Tom, you seem to have trouble with Jesus fulfilling things. Note all the passages that use this terminology:

Matthew 1:22 Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying,

Matthew 2:5 And they said unto him, In Bethlehem of Judaea: for thus it is written by the prophet,

Matthew 2:15 And was there until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son.

Matthew 2:17 Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet, saying,

Matthew 2:23 And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene.

Matthew 3:15  And Jesus answering said unto him, Suffer it to be so now: for thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness. Then he suffered him.
that "all righteousness" should be fulfilled in his actions.

Matthew 4:14 That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying,

Matthew 8:17 That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying, Himself took our infirmities, and bare our sicknesses.

Luke 24:25 Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken:26 Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?27 And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.

Luke 24:44 And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me. 45 Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures,

John 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.40 And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life. 41 I receive not honour from men. 42 But I know you, that ye have not the love of God in you. 43 I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. 44 How can ye believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only? 45 Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. 46 For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me; for he wrote of me. 47 But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?

Tom with all this fulfilling by Jesus, do you doubt He fulfilled the Law also???? By keeping it and expanding it and fulfilling the 4th Commandment by becoming our REST:

Matthew 11:28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.29 Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.30 For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.

Ephesians 2:14 For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;

The Gentiles neither were required to keep the Sabbath or be circumcised. This was the partition broken down making the church one, Jew and Gentile in Christ.

Last edited by bob_2 (02-11-14 8:37 pm)

Offline

#149 02-13-14 5:06 pm

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Tom, where in the Law of Moses does it talk of Jesus Christ? Jesus says it does, and that He was to fulfill it on His earthly mission. Could it be a Savior that can dispense rest and peace? "... and ye shall find rest unto your souls". What else is the Christian ultimately seeking, the correct eschatological timing, the correct prediction of the Final Test?? The "Final Test", is there one, or is it hype from those that have trumped up a "moral" law, that will eliminate large numbers of "Sunday go to meeting" Christians from those that will rise to the heavens when Christ returns??? Really????

Last edited by bob_2 (02-13-14 5:13 pm)

Offline

#150 02-14-14 7:17 pm

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Book Review of New Covenant Theology by Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel

Tom said:

While Jesus gives his followers the assurance and hope of Eternal Life as well as spiritual rest from the guilt and condemnation of the law, he is not the fulfillment of the Sabbath, whatever that is supposed to mean.  Such views are mythical, confused, and false, without any historical foundation or theological substance.

Tom, you are frustrating, because the clear Word of God is not your guide as shown above. You have an agenda not based on the Bible. Because Jesus spoke about the Sabbath, does not make it anymore a part of the New Covenant, than the Feast of Tabernacles that He celebrated as a good Jew.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB