Adventists for Tomorrow

Our mission is to provide a free and open medium that will assist individuals in forming accurate, balanced, and thoughtful opinions regarding issues within and without the church.

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Due to a large increase in spam, I have frozen forum registration. If you are new to the site and want to register, e-mail me personally at vandolson@gmail.com. Thank you.

#1 01-01-09 11:18 pm

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Reisinger responds to Sproul's accusation of Antinomiani

An Open Letter to R.C. Sproul
From John G. Reisinger

   

...

    Dr. Sproul, please explain why your magazine labels New Covenant Theology as antinomian when we not only affirm just as strongly as you that the Christian is not only under clear objective ethical commandments in the New Covenant, but we also insist those New Covenant laws are even higher than those written on stone. How is it possible for our belief in a higher law to be turned into anti law? Your September issue of Tabletalk condemns us as heretics simply because we believe that our Lord Jesus Christ is a true lawgiver in his own right and, as such, gives higher and more spiritual laws than anything Moses ever gave. Why do we deserve the odious label of antinomian simply because we believe that Christ replaces Moses as the new lawgiver in exactly the same way he replaces Aaron as High Priest? Our view is completely consistent with the teaching of Hebrews 3:1-6. What is anti-law about binding a Christian's conscience to obey the higher demands of grace found in the Sermon on the Mount and the Epistles? How do we in any way demean either Moses or the holy Law of God by insisting that the law of God under the New Covenant demands a higher and deeper spiritual response than that given through Moses? Does progressive revelation not in any way apply to ethical behavior? Do you really believe that law can demand more than grace? Why must the highest, fullest, unchanging standard of moral conduct that God ever gave be those laws written on the stone tablets of the Covenant (Deut. 9:9-15 and Heb. 9:4) that God made with Israel? Why do you insist that Moses must be the greatest lawgiver; the giver of the 'eternal, unchanging, moral law of God,' and Christ merely be the greatest exegete of that law that God gave Moses? If the Sermon on the Mount is really no more than the greatest Rabbi's true exposition of the Ten Commandments, then would it not be correct to call that sermon "the Talmud of Jesus?" How is it unbiblical for us to insist that Christ is a greater lawgiver than Moses? How are we in anyway demeaning either Moses or the holy Law of God in any way by exalting Christ over Moses as the new Lawgiver?

    ...



The whole letter is very interesting. This is not as Bill Sorenson declares NCT creating a new religion, or "Spirit Law". Read the whole letter then lets talk.

Offline

#2 01-02-09 12:53 am

pilgrim99
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 147

Re: Reisinger responds to Sproul's accusation of Antinomiani

Bob,

Is there a link?

Offline

#3 01-02-09 1:18 am

don
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 1,121

Re: Reisinger responds to Sproul's accusation of Antinomiani

Devon, I think this is Bob's source.

http://www.soundofgrace.com/jgr/index074.htm

Offline

#4 01-02-09 3:06 am

bob_2
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 3,790

Re: Reisinger responds to Sproul's accusation of Antinomiani

Offline

#5 01-02-09 12:07 pm

pilgrim99
Member
Registered: 12-28-08
Posts: 147

Re: Reisinger responds to Sproul's accusation of Antinomiani

Don and Bob,

Thank you and Happy New Year.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB